RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 19, 2013, 11:43:37 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Miller moving 99.3 into Columbia?  (Read 886 times)
OnairPdMd
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 13


Is Miller moving 99.3 into Columbia?
« on: April 09, 2012, 03:46:27 PM »

WXRY is moving to 99.5 - Construction Permit Granted April 06 2012

Does that mean WWKT 99.3 will move in?

http://radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/finder?call=wxry&x=0&y=0&sr=Y&s=C
Logged
DudeFan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1963


Re: Is Miller moving 99.3 into Columbia?
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2012, 04:20:13 PM »

No.

WWKT has spacing issues with WKXC, WBT-FM Chester and 99.1 Barnwell. It cannot get close enough to throw a City Grade over Columbia.

With the promulgation of the new LPFM regulations implementing the removal of the 3rd Adjacency protection requirements, WXRY applied to change to 99.5 in order to improve our coverage.

WXRY is not afforded protection against a move-in other than Commission Policy that would deny a move-in if it would put an LPFM off the air.
Logged
Powell E. Way III W4OPW
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 792

Interested in AM radio DX, canine rescue


Re: Is Miller moving 99.3 into Columbia?
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2012, 01:31:43 PM »

Barnwell is off air, and won't return until the new station gets licensed and that won't be really soon.

Powell
Logged

NNNN
KyleAndMelissa22
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 339


Re: Is Miller moving 99.3 into Columbia?
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2012, 01:56:42 PM »

No.

WWKT has spacing issues with WKXC, WBT-FM Chester and 99.1 Barnwell. It cannot get close enough to throw a City Grade over Columbia.

With the promulgation of the new LPFM regulations implementing the removal of the 3rd Adjacency protection requirements, WXRY applied to change to 99.5 in order to improve our coverage.

WXRY is not afforded protection against a move-in other than Commission Policy that would deny a move-in if it would put an LPFM off the air.

I don't see how moving to 99.5 will improve coverage at all.
At 99.3 they are at only 17 watts, and moving to 99.5 will drop them to 16 watts.
The coverage maps (CP & Current) look the about same, however to try to improve coverage they'll need more power...
LPFMs can go up to 100 watts, I think XRY should apply for more watts so they can be better heard near Irmo, Lexington, Blythewood
and even the main stretch of I-20 where it fades out almost completely at times between exits 68 & 71.

BTW 99.5 is likely a worse choice than 99.3 in Columbia due to the Very close proximity to WKXC right in Aiken.
Without XRY on the air, WKXC would likely be stronger in Columbia than WBT.
I say apply to keep it at 99.3 with a null to the north and east (protect WBT & WWKT) from a power of at least 50 watts.
Logged
DudeFan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1963


Re: Is Miller moving 99.3 into Columbia?
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2012, 02:28:02 PM »

WXRY is looking for a more clear channel (note the lower case). Effective coverage is limited on 99.3 by the presence of two co-channels on either side. 99.5 only has one co-channel WKXC Aiken/Augusta. The frequency change may not be implemented depending on what is the reality in the field. Once a filing window opens up, a major change is possible, so the several other, more clear channels, are possible.

KyleandMelissa, LPFM does not permit directional antennas, at this point. In addition, the Commission is proposing a 250watt upgade class for "rural" LPFM's. At this point, Columbia is not considered "rural." But that is just the proposed rules.

The I-20 stretch is a matter of antenna height. That stretch is below the WXRY antenna view because of the terrain. The Meridian Building also causes a major shadow to the SSE.

Powell, I believe 99.1 was granted to the Catholic Church in Barnwell. How soon it gets built is another matter.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2012, 02:30:55 PM by DudeFan » Logged
Gatekeeper007
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 751


Re: Is Miller moving 99.3 into Columbia?
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2012, 08:22:09 AM »

I don't know when 99.1 will come back on the air, I was asked if I would like to apply for it back when it was open for WLRE but I didn't want a 25000 watt electric bill on a non commerical station in a rural area.  We have a change going on that effects a possible move to 99.3 on a translator and a mutual on a different translator on 99.5 in Orangeburg with Miller that's been pending for eight years.  Either way that's not going to effect your changes in any way.
Logged
DudeFan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1963


Re: Is Miller moving 99.3 into Columbia?
« Reply #6 on: April 11, 2012, 09:30:57 AM »

Gatekeeper, depending on our field tests in the next couple months, we may let the CP lapse.
Logged
Gatekeeper007
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 751


Re: Is Miller moving 99.3 into Columbia?
« Reply #7 on: April 12, 2012, 05:40:09 AM »

Our changes won't effect your range in any way.  Is the open frequency on 99.5 have less bleed over or less cochannel interference than 99.3 in your area.
Logged
DudeFan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1963


Re: Is Miller moving 99.3 into Columbia?
« Reply #8 on: April 12, 2012, 10:16:46 AM »

Our initial tests in downtown and Northeast are a remarkable improvement on 99.5. Full quieting stereo on Clemson Road and beyond. However, Irmo/St.Andrews and parts of Cayce are worse due to the co-channel WKXC.

We may wait until the filing window and then make a major change.
Logged
KyleAndMelissa22
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 339


Re: Is Miller moving 99.3 into Columbia?
« Reply #9 on: April 13, 2012, 04:52:36 PM »

We may wait until the filing window and then make a major change.

Wouldn't it be possible to go for the most power possible, 100 watts, surely that's allowed for most any LPFM,
I don't know why the current setup was only allowed 17 watts, heck even some pirate radio stations are stronger than that, LOL.  Roll Eyes

Also, out of curiousity, I'm guessing the electric bill for any 100 watt (or less) radio station should be under $10 a month to transmit,
as it'd take 10 hours at 100 watts to equal 1 kilowatt-hour (about 11¢ per kWh is average in SC)...Like running a light 100 watt light bulb all month. Huh
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.371 seconds with 20 queries.