RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 25, 2013, 12:59:07 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: A modest format flip proposal that would give radio a boost here in Boston  (Read 664 times)
surfin bird
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 97


A modest format flip proposal that would give radio a boost here in Boston
« on: May 03, 2012, 08:55:30 PM »

I know that some disagree with me in the sense that WAAF is getting stale. With the constant talk of WRKO and entercom wanting to make a few flips here and there (it happened with 'EEI) I propose the following:

1. 97.7. Become WRKO FM (Not a strong signal but sill doable)

2. Make 107.3 a multi-cultural station. A multi-lingual, multi-cultural station that plays the best putamayo world music and even some shows that are in other languages.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2012, 08:58:02 PM by surfin bird » Logged
Jimmy128
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 582


Re: A modest format flip proposal that would give radio a boost here in Boston
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2012, 09:02:25 PM »

WAAF is indeed getting stale. WKAF should bring back WBOT and WAAF could be WRKO FM.

That would give a black eye to WTKK & WXKS-AM.


With what WBOS is doing, I can't imagine anyone listening to WAAF.
Logged
chrocket87
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 667


Re: A modest format flip proposal that would give radio a boost here in Boston
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2012, 09:17:06 PM »

WAAF sounds like crap, but it makes $$$, so I'm gonna say no to losing BOTH frequencies. Maybe flip one to RKO, but AAF is here to stay as long as it's profitable.
Logged
reelyreal
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1488


Re: A modest format flip proposal that would give radio a boost here in Boston
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2012, 01:30:25 AM »

I think WAAF sounds great and doesn't get anywhere near the credit they deserve.  Fantastic personalities, the best production ANYWHERE in New England, and the smart mix of older rock with new rock.  It makes money, it has heritage, and the listeners are loyal.  WAAF is one of the few rock stations that still make it work.

They're not going anywhere, and I think WAAF deserves a lot more credit than they do.
Logged
raccoonradio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 13224


Re: A modest format flip proposal that would give radio a boost here in Boston
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2012, 01:56:44 AM »

It does make money and I doubt they'd do it. If they had another FM freq to put WRKO on,
they could do that but I doubt they'd flip WAAF.
Logged
RedWingCJS278
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 121


Re: A modest format flip proposal that would give radio a boost here in Boston
« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2012, 04:56:28 AM »

How WAAF can be making any money, as wretched as it sounds, is beyond my comprehension. But, one can never accuse the general public of having good taste. Anyway, I've seen their ratings, and they're not great. I think they would be higher if they switched to strictly classic rock and competed with WZLX. Mixing in today's wussified, watered-down rock (an opinion I'm hardly alone in) with the '90s 'alternative' and classic rock just sounds terrible. Go all classic rock and get rid of that lunkhead morning show, or throw in the towel.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.279 seconds with 20 queries.