RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 24, 2013, 05:20:02 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WFRQ Moving East to Hyannis  (Read 858 times)
reelyreal
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1487


WFRQ Moving East to Hyannis
« on: May 29, 2012, 02:10:39 PM »

John Garabedian's Codcomm Inc. is already making signal moves out on the Cape, Fybush had it this week.

WFRQ is currently running 6kw at 83 meters on 101.1 from the Mashpee Industrial Park.  The application is to move 9 or so miles east to the WPXC et. al. tower in Hyannis, then raise the height to 141 meters and drop the power to 2.9kw.

As Scott pointed out, that'll create quite a bit of overlap with simulcast WFQR Harwich Port, meaning it's pretty likely that the simulcast will end at some point.
Logged
raccoonradio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 13222


Re: WFRQ Moving East to Hyannis
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2012, 02:18:52 PM »

Yes I had mentioned a little while back that it's on 2 stations to help reach the entire Cape;
now one may wind up flipping, who knows.
Logged
Richard J. Cabral
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 269


Re: WFRQ Moving East to Hyannis
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2012, 01:50:12 AM »

A quick look at the FCC data for WPXC's licensed specifications:

http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/fmq?call=WPXC
141 meters HAAT @ 3.1 kW ERP

A quick look at the FCC data for WFRQ's application:

http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/fmq?call=WFRQ
141.3 meters HAAT @ 2.9 kW ERP

In theory, this change will make 101.1's signal similar to 102.9's.  1 meter = 3.28 feet, so this means the two stations will probably be running separate antennas with 101.1's about 9.84 feet above 102.9's, unless I am reading something wrong.  Also, 101.1 would be running only 200 watts less than 102.9.  I assume there are no issues with this move on needing to protect co-channel class B WGIR-FM serving Manchester, NH.
Logged
DanStrassberg
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2482


Re: WFRQ Moving East to Hyannis
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2012, 07:31:10 AM »

In theory, this change will make 101.1's signal similar to 102.9's.  1 meter = 3.28 feet, so this means the two stations will probably be running separate antennas with 101.1's about 9.84 feet above 102.9's, unless I am reading something wrong.  Also, 101.1 would be running only 200 watts less than 102.9.  I assume there are no issues with this move on needing to protect co-channel class B WGIR-FM serving Manchester, NH.

Nope. 0.3m = ~1' (not 9.84'). Unless one or both of the stations is/are directional, it appears that they will be sharing an antenna. The slight difference in height might be due to rounding or differences in surveying.
Logged
magenta3
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 9


Re: WFRQ Moving East to Hyannis
« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2012, 10:22:23 AM »

All this sounds interesting...thanks for the posts!  Did you know the GM of Cape Cod Nassau stations (PIXY - Frank) resigned?  His last day is May 31st. Looks like he is jumping the ship! 
Logged
reelyreal
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1487


Re: WFRQ Moving East to Hyannis
« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2012, 12:16:53 PM »

All this sounds interesting...thanks for the posts!  Did you know the GM of Cape Cod Nassau stations (PIXY - Frank) resigned?  His last day is May 31st. Looks like he is jumping the ship! 

That's pretty typical, and not surprising.  When new ownership comes in, so does new management.
Logged
Richard J. Cabral
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 269


Re: WFRQ Moving East to Hyannis
« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2012, 10:48:07 PM »

Nope. 0.3m = ~1' (not 9.84'). Unless one or both of the stations is/are directional, it appears that they will be sharing an antenna. The slight difference in height might be due to rounding or differences in surveying.

Oops.  For some reason I read it as 3m instead of .3m.  Even at almost 10 feet, I figured a separate antenna that close together was pushing it.  I would have to agree it will be sharing the same antenna.  Good catch.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.242 seconds with 20 queries.