RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 25, 2013, 07:12:36 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WAMZ plans downgrade  (Read 1573 times)
greg.hahn
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 738


WAMZ plans downgrade
« on: May 14, 2012, 12:49:38 PM »

WAMZ has filed an application to move from it's present site in Northern Bullitt County, to the site on Tucker Station road, where 790, 98.9, and 100.5 are all located.

See here

The application proposes remaining at 100KW ERP,  but lowering the antenna height from 672 feet to 514 feet HAAT. That's a huge downgrade.

Is that site on the east end that much better than the one in Bullitt county? Or is about selling some real estate and making some money?
Logged
radiorob2.0
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2081


Re: WAMZ plans downgrade
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2012, 05:39:34 PM »

WAMZ has filed an application to move from it's present site in Northern Bullitt County, to the site on Tucker Station road, where 790, 98.9, and 100.5 are all located.

See here

The application proposes remaining at 100KW ERP,  but lowering the antenna height from 672 feet to 514 feet HAAT. That's a huge downgrade.

Is that site on the east end that much better than the one in Bullitt county? Or is about selling some real estate and making some money?

There was a CP a few years back that would have put WAMZ on the WHAS tower but that expired.
Logged

“The heart of nearly every home was its radio. Radio has always kept us up to date on any subject. Radio is your friend, We’ll always be here for you, our friends, our listeners. Radio never an intruder, always a guest.” . . . Edith Bennett 1931-2013
greg.hahn
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 738


Re: WAMZ plans downgrade
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2012, 09:39:30 PM »

WAMZ has filed an application to move from it's present site in Northern Bullitt County, to the site on Tucker Station road, where 790, 98.9, and 100.5 are all located.

See here

The application proposes remaining at 100KW ERP,  but lowering the antenna height from 672 feet to 514 feet HAAT. That's a huge downgrade.

Is that site on the east end that much better than the one in Bullitt county? Or is about selling some real estate and making some money?

There was a CP a few years back that would have put WAMZ on the WHAS tower but that expired.

True. But the WHAS tower is 663' tall. That CP wasn't much of a downgrade, if any. This is.
Logged
Bengalsfan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1662


Re: WAMZ plans downgrade
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2012, 08:30:36 AM »

So they are putting all their eggs in one basket so if anything ever happens at that site, they will have four stations off instead of just one.  I would think the Brooks site to be more valuable than 790's.
Logged
KyDXIn
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1561


Re: WAMZ plans downgrade
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2012, 06:37:40 PM »

Wasn't the 98.9 signal downgraded with the move to Prospect? 
Logged
BobOnTheJob
Indiana's Circuit Ridin' Radio Engineer
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3653


Re: WAMZ plans downgrade
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2012, 07:29:03 PM »

Wasn't the 98.9 signal downgraded with the move to Prospect? 
Only if you consider a Class B to Class C2 a downgrade. Same power and height parameters, but the B is protected to the 54dbu contour whereas I believe the C2 only gets protection to the 60dbu. In the local area where the population lives, I'd expect it was--in practical terms--an upgrade.
Logged

When I started in radio in 1967, most broadcast equipment used tube technology, all recorded music was played from records on a turntable by live DJ's, there was no satellite delivery...and radio was fun.
oxford777
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 75


Re: WAMZ plans downgrade
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2012, 09:01:41 PM »

So they are putting all their eggs in one basket so if anything ever happens at that site, they will have four stations off instead of just one.  I would think the Brooks site to be more valuable than 790's.

There was a discussion a few pages back about 'AMZ installing a new antenna that might have been aimed (no pun) at addressing the problem of them disappearing just east of the Highlands. Maybe that didn't work. So maybe now they're trading Glendale for Grinstead Drive. This CP probably isn't to improve their signal to the east, though that would happen.     
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.367 seconds with 19 queries.