RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 19, 2013, 10:03:03 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ... 50   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel  (Read 36384 times)
raccoonradio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 13217


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #260 on: May 26, 2012, 10:33:41 PM »

There's sports talk and there's political, etc. talk. It would be 2 of each if they went talk.
And who knows maybe someday Kenny G will re-appear on 96.9 Smiley Or Greater could
try another musical format. CC would well try cons. talk on 101.7 with two and maybe
even 3 local hosts.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2012, 10:39:23 PM by raccoonradio » Logged
Fenway1912
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 602


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #261 on: May 26, 2012, 11:19:53 PM »

Let's look at the total picture of CC in Boston

2 FM's that are solid revenue producers

2 AM's that are small blips on the radar.

They spent a small fortune on upgrading 1200 AM with no results.

They have decided spending 14.5 million for 101.7 is worth it and given the radio theorem of 'billable hours' they may have decided to make a run at WMJX given the downtown transmitter of WFNX.

Clear Channel has done very well in New York with WLTW-FM and in Chicago with WLIT-FM. If CC went soft rock and added Delilah at night they would hurt Magic 106.

Radio is all about Monday-Friday 6 AM to 6 PM to sell....

Logged
DanStrassberg
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2481


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #262 on: May 27, 2012, 05:07:13 PM »

Clear Channel has done very well in New York with WLTW-FM and in Chicago with WLIT-FM. If CC went soft rock and added Delilah at night they would hurt Magic 106.

Do you really believe that the little directional 101.7 signal from One Financial Center could compete with the big nondirectional 106.7 signal from the Pru if the two stations were broadcasting similar content? You doubtless will say that the signal difference will be important in the suburbs but much less so in town. Still, in the kind of head-to-head battle you are suggesting, spots on the weaker signal would have to be heavily discounted with respect to spots on the stronger signal. Doesn't sound to me like a good formula for making big $$$ to pay off the added $14.5 million of debt CCU will be taking on to pay for 101.7.
Logged
Fenway1912
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 602


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #263 on: May 27, 2012, 05:40:54 PM »





Clear Channel has done very well in New York with WLTW-FM and in Chicago with WLIT-FM. If CC went soft rock and added Delilah at night they would hurt Magic 106.

Do you really believe that the little directional 101.7 signal from One Financial Center could compete with the big nondirectional 106.7 signal from the Pru if the two stations were broadcasting similar content? You doubtless will say that the signal difference will be important in the suburbs but much less so in town. Still, in the kind of head-to-head battle you are suggesting, spots on the weaker signal would have to be heavily discounted with respect to spots on the stronger signal. Doesn't sound to me like a good formula for making big $$$ to pay off the added $14.5 million of debt CCU will be taking on to pay for 101.7.

True Dan - unless CC decides to simulcast WSRS on 101.7 - and then in turn bump up the WSRS rate card. It would be similar to Entercom buying 97.7 to simulcast 107.3 ( and Entercom paid far more for WILD-FM 6 years ago )

The listen at work format works - it is very unclear if Boston really wants another talk station.
Logged
DavidEduardo
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 24778

“Poetry is nearer to vital truth than history."


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #264 on: May 27, 2012, 08:59:16 PM »


True Dan - unless CC decides to simulcast WSRS on 101.7 - and then in turn bump up the WSRS rate card.


WSRS is a big biller in the Worcester market, which is separate from Boston. If they increase rates they will not be affordable by the Worcester clients, and the Boston clients don't buy Worcester as part of their Boston buy.

I don't know of any cases where a station is able to sell two separate rated markets in a combo... perhaps some cases exist, but they go against the way radio is bought.
Logged

"To remain ignorant of things that happened before you were born is to remain a child." - CICERO

www.americanradiohistory.com - Broadcasting Magazine and Yearbooks and RCA Broadcast News, Television Magazine, Radio News, Sponsor, Radio / Televsion Age...
Fenway1912
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 602


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #265 on: May 27, 2012, 09:28:40 PM »

It is very easy to feed separate commercials to the transmitters. Entercom has done it for years with the Providence side of WEEI.

Much as I want to gag typing this - getting Deliah solidly into Boston will produce numbers.



True Dan - unless CC decides to simulcast WSRS on 101.7 - and then in turn bump up the WSRS rate card.


WSRS is a big biller in the Worcester market, which is separate from Boston. If they increase rates they will not be affordable by the Worcester clients, and the Boston clients don't buy Worcester as part of their Boston buy.

I don't know of any cases where a station is able to sell two separate rated markets in a combo... perhaps some cases exist, but they go against the way radio is bought.
Logged
raccoonradio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 13217


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #266 on: May 27, 2012, 09:45:07 PM »

Show site lists WPLM as affiliate
Logged
DavidEduardo
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 24778

“Poetry is nearer to vital truth than history."


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #267 on: May 27, 2012, 09:53:15 PM »

It is very easy to feed separate commercials to the transmitters. Entercom has done it for years with the Providence side of WEEI.


Then it is not a simulcast.
Logged

"To remain ignorant of things that happened before you were born is to remain a child." - CICERO

www.americanradiohistory.com - Broadcasting Magazine and Yearbooks and RCA Broadcast News, Television Magazine, Radio News, Sponsor, Radio / Televsion Age...
DanStrassberg
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2481


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #268 on: May 28, 2012, 10:23:07 AM »

It is very easy to feed separate commercials to the transmitters. Entercom has done it for years with the Providence side of WEEI.
Then it is not a simulcast.

Ed Levine of Galaxy Communications in central New York has used this technique on stations in Syracuse, Rome, and Utica for years. When I heard it, five or more years ago, it was very well executed--down to having the air talent voice different spots that aired simultaneously on stations in different markets. Since then, Galaxy has expanded into the Albany/Schenectady/Troy market and most likely these non-simulcasts now appear there as well. Seems to take some pretty talented folks to pull it off without screwing it up (spots need to be timed to within a second or two and automation failures can be real disasters), but I didn't hear any such mishaps.
Logged
Fenway1912
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 602


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #269 on: May 28, 2012, 12:47:25 PM »

Show site lists WPLM as affiliate

Deliah is on WSRS and WPLM but both stations have problems in Boston proper. Women 18-49 love her show and she would bring people over to 101.7.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ... 50   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.489 seconds with 19 queries.