RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 24, 2013, 08:29:15 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 50   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel  (Read 36651 times)
wcozBoston
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 120


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #70 on: May 16, 2012, 07:18:40 PM »

Someone else mentioned it and hope that others can provide more technical insight to suggesting that CC turn off 101.7 all together and physically move 101.5 up to the Boston market verses it being in the Providence market.  Is it possible to amend the Table of Allocations to have 101.5 licensed to Needham, or Dedham for example with a transmitter at FM128?  Would they have to protect WCIB and WGIR, how much protection would there have be to protect WWHQ, also on 101.5 up in the Lakes region of N.H? 

Format wise, could they try to bring back Mike FM?  Entercom received decent ratings with it, would it work again?

Why didn't Entercom go after WFNX?
Logged
chrocket87
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 667


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #71 on: May 16, 2012, 07:58:09 PM »

They did. FNX didn't like the offer from them.
Logged
Signpost
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 425

"PLAYING ALL OF THE MOST MUSIC " actual positioner


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #72 on: May 16, 2012, 08:10:52 PM »

Last time you could see FNX in the ratings, the stream almost tied the terrestrial signal.      Whatever CC does with the signal, they'll have the same issues that hampered FNX's ability to get ratings in a market that stretches from Providence to Worcester to Manchester NH.      It won't be any more successful than FNX was ratings wise, and likely do worse revenue wise given FNX's college educated demographic.

I really hope they keep it alternative, even if they run it lean WBOS style.

Logged
Fenway1912
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 603


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #73 on: May 16, 2012, 08:13:35 PM »

They did. FNX didn't like the offer from them.

Other way around - Entercom thought Mindich was squeezing them. Mindich had been advised that Entercom did not want to blow up the other FM's.

Does anybody know how much the Phoenix paid for WLYN-FM 29 years ago?
Logged
reelyreal
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1487


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #74 on: May 16, 2012, 08:15:11 PM »

Someone else mentioned it and hope that others can provide more technical insight to suggesting that CC turn off 101.7 all together and physically move 101.5 up to the Boston market verses it being in the Providence market.  Is it possible to amend the Table of Allocations to have 101.5 licensed to Needham, or Dedham for example with a transmitter at FM128?  Would they have to protect WCIB and WGIR, how much protection would there have be to protect WWHQ, also on 101.5 up in the Lakes region of N.H? 

You can't delete WFNX from the table of allotments.  You'd be taking away the theoretical "first local fm service" to the community of Lynn.  That's of course in addition to the other technical considerations.  You can't just pick up a B and move it from Providence to Boston.  There are a lot of first and second adjacents to protect beyond WFNX.

The best case scenario for the 101.7 signal would be WWBB going directional to provide a little more wiggle room for WFNX.  WCIB will always be a concern, however.
Logged
jlehmann
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1966


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #75 on: May 16, 2012, 08:21:43 PM »

The best case scenario for the 101.7 signal would be WWBB going directional to provide a little more wiggle room for WFNX.  WCIB will always be a concern, however.

WWBB already is directional away from them. Maybe they could go even more directional, or downgrade to a B1. I suppose they could also pay off WCIB to do the same.
Logged
reelyreal
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1487


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #76 on: May 16, 2012, 08:28:56 PM »

Does anybody know how much the Phoenix paid for WLYN-FM 29 years ago?

$1.1 Million in 1982

http://www.americanradiohistory.com/Archive-BC-IDX/82-OCR/BC-1982-11-29-Page-0051.pdf#search="wlyn"
Logged
Scott Fybush
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 4290


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #77 on: May 16, 2012, 08:36:19 PM »

Someone else mentioned it and hope that others can provide more technical insight to suggesting that CC turn off 101.7 all together and physically move 101.5 up to the Boston market verses it being in the Providence market.  Is it possible to amend the Table of Allocations to have 101.5 licensed to Needham, or Dedham for example with a transmitter at FM128?  Would they have to protect WCIB and WGIR, how much protection would there have be to protect WWHQ, also on 101.5 up in the Lakes region of N.H? 

You can't delete WFNX from the table of allotments.  You'd be taking away the theoretical "first local fm service" to the community of Lynn.  That's of course in addition to the other technical considerations.  You can't just pick up a B and move it from Providence to Boston.  There are a lot of first and second adjacents to protect beyond WFNX.

It's a little more complex than that. WFNX is actually the second local service to Lynn (thanks to WLYN), but it doesn't matter whether a station is first, second or 34th local service to its community of license: you can't delete a commercial FM allocation, period. If you hand in the WFNX license, 101.7A Lynn simply becomes an open channel, still protected, and available at auction the next time the FCC auctions off open FM channels.

And even if you could do all that, you still can't put 101.5B in Needham or Dedham or anywhere useful around Boston, since you have to provide 24 km of spacing between WBUR's transmitter in Newton and a theoretical 101.5B facility.

OK...it's a lot more complex, actually, come to think of it.

Quote
The best case scenario for the 101.7 signal would be WWBB going directional to provide a little more wiggle room for WFNX.  WCIB will always be a concern, however.

Yup. It's not giving anything away to say that some of the best minds in the FM allocations community are looking extremely closely at what could be done here, and the options are extremely limited at best. There's just too much to protect: IF spacing to WBUR, WWBB and WCIB (and Meredith NH, too) on first-adjacent channels, WGIR-FM on the third-adjacent, and you can't move any of those without affecting even more short-spaced allocations around eastern New England.
Logged

All kinds of good stuff over at http://www.fybush.com
Gadon
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 296


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #78 on: May 16, 2012, 08:41:11 PM »

I'm hearing more for spanish, and perhaps a simulcast of AM1200.. No one is saying urban, or urban AC ? Clear Channel would look like 'rock stars', sort of speak, having 101.7 programmed for the African-American community in the local Boston area, where most of the signal is. CC has many urban / urban AC stations in their portfolio, nationwide.
Logged
wickedwritah
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 150


Re: WFNX being sold to Clear Channel
« Reply #79 on: May 16, 2012, 09:50:03 PM »

Seems to me the IF with WBUR is the main fly in the ointment? You would figure it would be easy to deal with interference issues with two co-owned stations.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 50   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.323 seconds with 19 queries.