RadioDiscussions.com

 
Login June 19, 2013, 09:33:18 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Follow-up interview with Mike McConnell posted  (Read 1828 times)
ml
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 51


Follow-up interview with Mike McConnell posted
« on: May 18, 2012, 10:45:11 PM »

Hi there--a while ago, I posted a thread about doing a follow-up interview with Mike McConnell, and it's finally posted. I asked him questions early this year, then some serious stuff happened in my offline life, so I put off doing anything more with it. I asked him another question today, and it's finally done. Thanks to those folks here who showed interest. Enjoy!

Today's interview:

http://podcast.radiogirl.us/2012/05/mike-mcconnell-still-at-wgn-and-answers.html

The previous interview that he did when he first went to WGN. It was a very popular one!

http://podcast.radiogirl.us/2010/10/mike-mcconnell-from-cincinnati-to.html
Logged

norman881
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 73


Re: Follow-up interview with Mike McConnell posted
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2012, 05:48:46 AM »

Thank you very much for posting your interview.  I listen to his podcast daily.  He sounds a lot more comfortable now that the Chicago folks are getting use to him.

Norman
Logged
ml
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 51


Re: Follow-up interview with Mike McConnell posted
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2012, 08:56:24 AM »

His podcasts seem to be very popular.
Logged

microbob
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 1945


Re: Follow-up interview with Mike McConnell posted
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2012, 03:57:11 PM »

Mike still has fans in town who call in to his show on WGN. It would be interesting to know what percentage of his podcast downloads are from the Greater Cincinnati Area. I'm sure it is pretty high.
Logged
Rambo
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 63


Re: Follow-up interview with Mike McConnell posted
« Reply #4 on: May 22, 2012, 05:11:11 PM »

Thanks for the interview. Really enjoyed listening.

WLW has certainly done a poor job in replacing Mike.
Logged
ml
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 51


Re: Follow-up interview with Mike McConnell posted
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2012, 10:39:48 AM »

Thanks. I haven't heard his replacements, but a few people have said that time slot hasn't been as good since he left.
Logged

OhioMediaWatch
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3609


Re: Follow-up interview with Mike McConnell posted
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2012, 04:24:59 AM »

Great job on the followup, Margaret!

Yeah, I don't keep an eye on the Cincinnati market as much as I did in the past...I made a decision to focus on the "home turf" of Northeast Ohio because, well, that's where I am. Cheesy

Trying to cover Cincinnati from here was difficult, since I didn't really have a sense of the "lay of the land" outside of a familiarity with, well, WLW.  Ask Cleveland traffic reporters about that, if Kiese's recent post is to be believed.

But I always thought the hand-wringing in Chicago over McConnell going to Chicago and WGN was a bit overdone.  He was lumped in with his former WLW stationmate Bill Cunningham, and they were presented as basically the same kind of host.  Willie's a bomb thrower, and McConnell is more measured.  I know that even in Cleveland.

I wish we had someone like Margaret doing this here in Ohio.  I'd be the natural person to do it up here, but my voice will never be attached to anything connected to OMW, so, sorry.
Logged
ml
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 51


Re: Follow-up interview with Mike McConnell posted
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2012, 08:27:08 AM »

Thanks! My parents grew up in NE Ohio and my grandparents lived in Canton, so I feel like I have a connection there. My mom often talked about Ohio (especially Massillon), and my dad talks about it all the time (especially Canton). When he was in high school, he was offered an on-air job at WHBC, but he didn't take it. That was in the 1940's, when radio was still vibrant  Undecided

I would like to interview people in NE Ohio. I'm trying to get my dad to make a trip there with me, but if I don't go there, I can do interviews via phone. Let me know Smiley

I would like to interview Bill Cunningham sometime, for sure.
Logged

almaniac27
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 857


Re: Follow-up interview with Mike McConnell posted
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2012, 04:23:20 PM »

Thanks! My parents grew up in NE Ohio and my grandparents lived in Canton, so I feel like I have a connection there. My mom often talked about Ohio (especially Massillon), and my dad talks about it all the time (especially Canton). When he was in high school, he was offered an on-air job at WHBC, but he didn't take it. That was in the 1940's, when radio was still vibrant  Undecided

I would like to interview people in NE Ohio. I'm trying to get my dad to make a trip there with me, but if I don't go there, I can do interviews via phone. Let me know Smiley

I would like to interview Bill Cunningham sometime, for sure.

Margaret and OMW? I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship.
Logged

"And if I don't see ya, in a long, long while
I'll try to find you
Left of the dial"
ml
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 51


Re: Follow-up interview with Mike McConnell posted
« Reply #9 on: June 13, 2012, 10:46:05 AM »

OMW: have your people call my people Tongue
Logged

Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 19 queries.