RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 24, 2013, 05:08:57 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Limbaugh takes post-Fluke ratings hit  (Read 2423 times)
beachguy3b
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 412


Re: Limbaugh takes post-Fluke ratings hit
« Reply #20 on: May 30, 2012, 08:13:52 AM »

I find it amusing that people cannot discuss this topic from a professional perspective, but, rather, they have to devolve into hate filled goofs.

Absolutely hilarious, if concerning.
Logged
Goat Rodeo Cowboy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4159


Re: Limbaugh takes post-Fluke ratings hit
« Reply #21 on: May 30, 2012, 09:40:26 AM »


I find it amusing that people cannot discuss this topic from a professional perspective, but, rather, they have to devolve into hate filled goofs.
 

Lead out on this for us.  What are the elements of this topic that lend themselves to a "professional perspective".

It is a News/Talk forum,  so what are the elements of this topic that should be considered from a News/Talk professional view.

The thread had in the title an observation that ratings were taking a hit.  There seems to be some debate whether the ratings are taking a hit or not.  It would be a "professional perspective" to read some current information about ACTUAL RATINGS.  You have any news on that status... news that is of professional quality?

Logged

Community broadcasting blogged at www.yourlpfm.com
umfan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 437


Re: Limbaugh takes post-Fluke ratings hit
« Reply #22 on: May 30, 2012, 10:53:11 AM »

Actual, verifiable data would certainly be welcome.
Logged
Ultimajock
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3629


Re: Limbaugh takes post-Fluke ratings hit
« Reply #23 on: May 30, 2012, 08:49:28 PM »

...if Limbaugh ever encountered actual, certifiable data, his skull would implode from the pressure...
Logged

King Daevid MacKenzie
beachguy3b
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 412


Re: Limbaugh takes post-Fluke ratings hit
« Reply #24 on: May 31, 2012, 11:57:28 AM »

Actual, verifiable data would certainly be welcome.

Nicely put.

As to the previous comment- perhaps avoiding the nasty political snarking would be a step towards professionalism. I could discuss Howard Stern without hating on his show even though I didn't like it. But this thread is more about masty slams at Rush than about radio itself.
Logged
Goat Rodeo Cowboy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4159


Re: Limbaugh takes post-Fluke ratings hit
« Reply #25 on: May 31, 2012, 05:04:34 PM »


But this thread is more about masty slams at Rush than about radio itself.


My first reaction was to want to write a response in bold, all-caps and underlined....   but that is what we are talking about...  conversation without screaming and all-caps and name calling.

Here is my reaction to what you just wrote,  and I say this as carefully and graciously as I can... but it seems to me that here is the "situation packaged up with foil wrapping paper and a ribbon on it."

The thread, as you have put it, is about nasty slams at Rush rather than radio itself.  Point well taken,  but since Rush is the MASTER of putting forward nasty slams,  one can assume that there will be much conversation in which people want to respond nasty slams about Rush.

But that doesn't get at what you wrote.  Does all of this give us some kind of license, some kind of free pass to make nasty slams about radio?

If radio operated in the mode of a public utility  (which isn't a totally off-base descriptions of what radio was 50 or 60 years ago,  then we would probably be off base to compase hasty slams about radio...  we would be off base to always talk about Rush and never talk about radio itself).  But radio today has a lot of freedom that it did not always enjoy.  (Not necessarily freedom as in reduced government regulation...  but freedom as in the public will tolerate things they would not tolerate in the past.

The radio no longer has a face, a persona...   Radio follows the dollar and you can create some quick controversy by starting a conversation about regulation of radio, etc.  If radio has become just this trolley, this street car, the subway line that anybody gets on if they have the price of the ticket...

    what is there to discuss if we just want to discuss radio itself.  It's like the air we wade around in all day.  What's to discuss.  Breathe it or don't breathe it.  Take your choice.  What do we discuss in that area?  We talk about the pollen count.  We talk about the humidity level.  We talk about the crap floating around that will turn into acid rain during the next thunderstorm.

We don't talk about radio.  We just talk about the crap that is floating around in there.   Rush is our acid rain so we discuss whether he is corrosive or not.  Some days he is like the spring pollen so you either go out and take Rush in and get the drippy nose,  or you stay home with the special A/C filter.

Logged

Community broadcasting blogged at www.yourlpfm.com
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.33 seconds with 20 queries.