RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 18, 2013, 02:22:37 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CBC analog transmitters  (Read 5017 times)
M.J.
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2078


CBC analog transmitters
« on: June 02, 2012, 10:07:28 PM »

CBC/Radio-Canada recently made its official application to the CRTC to eliminate every single one of its analog rebroadcast transmitters, English or French, regardless of the community size. In the application, CBC officials once again made the false claim about how few Canadians use OTA.

The CBC's application to the CRTC includes the number of people served by each transmitter, broken down by knowledge of the two official languages. I have compiled a list of all the transmitters that serve populations of 50,000 viewers or more, in the language of the transmitting station.

English Network

Newfoundland and Labrador
Grand Falls CBNAT

Nova Scotia
Middleton CBHT-6
Mulgrave CBHT-11
Sydney CBIT

New Brunswick
Bon Accord CBAT-TV-1
Campbellton CBAT-TV-4
Moncton CBAT-TV-2
Saint John CBAT-TV

Quebec
Quebec CBVE-TV
Sherbrooke CBMT-3
Trois-Rivieres CBMT-1

Ontario
Huntsville CBLT-TV-2
Kitchener CBLN-TV-1
London CBLN-TV
North Bay CBLT-4
Pembroke CBOT-6
Sarnia CBLN-TV-2
Sault Ste. Marie CBLT-5
Sudbury CBLT-6
Timmins CBLT-7
Wingham CBLN-TV-4

Saskatchewan
Moose Jaw CBKT-1
Prince Albert CBKST-9
Saskatoon CBKST
Warmley CBKT-7
Yorkton CBKT-6

Alberta
Grande Prairie CBXAT
Lethbridge CBRT-6
Red Deer CBXT-13

British Columbia
Braeloch CBUT-39
Chilliwack CBUT-2
Kelowna CBUT-38
Nelson CBUCT
Penticton CBUT-40
Salmon Arm CBUT-43
Vernon CBUT-41

French Network

New Brunswick
Allardville CBAFT-3
Campbellton CBAFT-7
Edmundston CBAFT-2

Quebec
Beauceville CBVT-6
Carleton CBGAT-14
Mont-Laurier CBFT-2
Mont-Tremblant CBFT-1
Stoneham CBVT-8

Ontario
Sudbury CBLFT-2

Alberta
Calgary CBRFT

I think that CBC has severely underestimated how many viewers will be affected by this. I know myself that if I was an advertiser, I'd be demanding discounts on my national advertising, or finding better places to advertise.
Logged
OhioMediaWatch
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3609


Re: CBC analog transmitters
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2012, 12:16:29 PM »

I can't believe London is actually going to lose CBC English service, just because it doesn't have a studio and repeats CBLT.

Yes, I know you can use cable/satellite. I'm curious if anyone has done an OTA percentage study in London...I'm guessing it'd be higher than, say, Toronto.
Logged
M.J.
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2078


Re: CBC analog transmitters
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2012, 10:02:31 PM »

I can't believe London is actually going to lose CBC English service, just because it doesn't have a studio and repeats CBLT.

Yes, I know you can use cable/satellite. I'm curious if anyone has done an OTA percentage study in London...I'm guessing it'd be higher than, say, Toronto.

Even though I lived in London for many years, I have very little knowledge of actual OTA usage in the city. Most people I know there are cable users.

What I do know is that OTA usage in some of the smaller communities near London is higher than the broadcasters would have us believe. When I worked for one of the cable companies during part of last year, I talked to a sizable number of people who were either relying solely on OTA, or had OTA on one or more TV sets. I made a point of asking these people what channels they were getting. In Forest, Ontario, in particular I'd say between 10 and 20% of viewers there use OTA exclusively; cable is not available in the whole area, and not everyone wants to pay for satellite. I specifically asked these people which channel(s) they got CBC on, and most got it on Channel 34 (Sarnia) - now one of the transmitters slated for shutdown. One man I spoke with said he gets 50 channels (including subchannels), including everything from Detroit. He said he bought a digital box when the U.S. transition was happening, and was very happy with what he was now getting.

In other communities, the numbers weren't as high as Forest, but I'd say they were between 5 and 10%. I found that OTA usage picked up as one got closer to Toronto; in Arthur for instance, I'd say it was around 10%, with most viewers reporting receiving CKVR Barrie, CKCO Kitchener, Global Paris, and sometimes the Toronto stations.

I reported some of my anecdotal findings to some of the other marketing people, and they were very surprised at how many people were actually using OTA. They had assumed that nobody used OTA anymore.

I was still working for this company at the time of the DTV transition, and not one of the people who reported using OTA exclusively ended up signing up for cable - this was something I made a point of tracking. The people I was signing up for cable were mostly people who were fed up with Bell, with a minority being people who had recently moved into their dwelling and had planned to get cable anyways. What I don't know is whether these people signed up for satellite, or bought a digital box; I would lean towards the latter, because the OTA users often told me that they didn't watch enough TV to warrant paying for it, and they were happy with only a few channels.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2012, 10:12:07 PM by M.J. » Logged
azumanga
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4985


Re: CBC analog transmitters
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2012, 02:07:31 PM »

In Windsor, the local MPs and the City Council has urged the CBC to keep the local Radio-Canada repeater, CBEFT, going, either as it is, or as a subchannel of CBET:

http://www.windsorstar.com/life/French/6749217/story.html
https://services.crtc.gc.ca/pub/ListeInterventionList/Documents.aspx?ID=168888&Lang=e
Logged
M.J.
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2078


Re: CBC analog transmitters
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2012, 09:11:14 PM »

In Windsor, the local MPs and the City Council has urged the CBC to keep the local Radio-Canada repeater, CBEFT, going, either as it is, or as a subchannel of CBET:

http://www.windsorstar.com/life/French/6749217/story.html
https://services.crtc.gc.ca/pub/ListeInterventionList/Documents.aspx?ID=168888&Lang=e

The Windsor Star article has one major error:

CBC and Radio-Canada are eliminating 600 analogue transmitters across the country in compliance with a 2010 CRTC decision to phase out analogue in favour of digital transmitters.

The CRTC is not forcing the CBC to shut down analog transmitters in most of the country, although analog is supposed to be eliminated from Windsor.
Logged
OhioMediaWatch
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3609


Re: CBC analog transmitters
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2012, 10:00:23 AM »

I just can't get over the fact that Canada's public broadcaster is giving up over-air service to a community the size of London.

A commercial network? Sure.

I wonder if there'd be a chance for digital conversion in London if the budget was not in such bad shape.
Logged
w9wi
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4285


Re: CBC analog transmitters
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2012, 11:18:31 AM »

I just can't get over the fact that Canada's public broadcaster is giving up over-air service to a community the size of London.

A commercial network? Sure.

I wonder if there'd be a chance for digital conversion in London if the budget was not in such bad shape.

Probably.

I wonder whether any commercial stations would consider re-affiliating with CBC -- and whether the CBC would be receptive to such moves.

Indeed, going a bit outside the box, I wonder whether some commercial stations might consider carrying the CBC on a .2 subchannel in return for a cut of the advertising revenue?  You could probably do that at nearly zero expense to the CBC, some enhancement to revenue (even though they claim the OTA shutdown will have no effect on that), the cost to the commercial station would be an IRD (~$2k) and an MPEG encoder.  (about the same)  I'd be very surprised if the CRTC would object. 

But as long as CBC also doesn't seem receptive to carrying the minority-language service on a .2 of the digital transmitters they do have, I guess they really would just as soon be rid of OTA altogether.
Logged
OhioMediaWatch
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3609


Re: CBC analog transmitters
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2012, 01:44:33 PM »

But as long as CBC also doesn't seem receptive to carrying the minority-language service on a .2 of the digital transmitters they do have, I guess they really would just as soon be rid of OTA altogether.

Yeah, I guess we're still thinking like Americans. There appears to be very little interest in OTA in Canada.

But I can understand the OTA service going away as a decision by commercial broadcasters. Isn't there some sort of public service mandate for the CBC?

As it turns out, the reality is the opposite...London's commercial broadcasters have all converted to digital, and CBLN/40 is going dark in any form. Maybe they think CBC Radio One (93.5) can fill some of the public service gap.
Logged
M.J.
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2078


Re: CBC analog transmitters
« Reply #8 on: June 13, 2012, 10:56:20 PM »

I think for CBC it is more of a strategic decision than a financial decision. I can almost guarantee that they were looking for the first positive PR opportunity to make this move, and a large budget cut from the federal government is the perfect opportunity. Never mind that their management is top-heavy and there are much more beneficial things CBC could be doing to save money. Cutting off a whole group of viewers completely from the service is not going to help CBC.

Could CBC save money by shutting down analog transmitters? Absolutely. However, I fail to see the benefit to them by cutting off up to 10% of their viewership in cities like London.
Logged
azumanga
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4985


Re: CBC analog transmitters
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2012, 01:13:35 AM »

Could CBC save money by shutting down analog transmitters? Absolutely. However, I fail to see the benefit to them by cutting off up to 10% of their viewership in cities like London.

In my opinion, it would be prudent if the CBC closes down transmitters in rural areas where everyone is getting television on cable and satellite, and hardly anyone (if at all) watches it over the air, or in areas where there is virtually no audience for it (such as Radio-Canada's translators in the BC Interior, for example). But in major areas where there's a sizable amount of viewers still watching over-the-air (such as Windsor, London and Saskatoon), such a tactic would not work in CBC's favor.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.36 seconds with 19 queries.