RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 23, 2013, 02:20:10 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WHICH ATL FORMATS ARE UNDERPERFORMING & RIPE FOR SOME "BETTER" COMPETITION  (Read 858 times)
gregg75
STOP THE PRESSES !!!
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2754


WHICH ATL FORMATS ARE UNDERPERFORMING & RIPE FOR SOME "BETTER" COMPETITION
« on: June 13, 2012, 09:07:49 AM »

The Urbans appear to be doing fine.
So are the talks/news and Christians.

Oldies are underperforming (WSRV, WNNX) and should run for cover.

CHR could be doing better, but is healthy (WWWQ, WWVA, WSTR).

Country is underperforming (WUBL, WKHX) and should be doing better.

Rock has seen better days (WKLS).

FORMATS NEEDING COMPETITION (in order): Oldies, Rock, Country, CHR.
Just my opinions........not defending them though. And Yours?
Logged

Atlanta's BEST web-streaming Dance stations
(right click player page for faster connection)


Rhythmic AC/Disco-Dance-Funk 1975-1990+
http://www.krykey.com/Radio/PRSPage.aspx?id=956

Dance-House/Rhythmic AC (late 80's-today)
http://www.krykey.com/Radio/PRSPage.aspx?id=1885
jabba17
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2789


Re: WHICH ATL FORMATS ARE UNDERPERFORMING & RIPE FOR SOME "BETTER" COMPETITION
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2012, 09:23:21 AM »

FORMATS NEEDING COMPETITION (in order): Oldies, Rock, Country, CHR.
Just my opinions........not defending them though. And Yours?
Country doesn't need any more competition...if Kicks and Bull can't make enough competition between them then the format has an issue or the format is glutted (don't forget about all the country rimshots like WNGC, South 107, and Bear, among others).

CHR doesn't need any more competition, either--but the format does need to sort itself out and figure out who is doing what instead of the big perennial AC chase.

Oldies/Classic Top 40 is ripe for the picking.  Rock is similar to CHR--fragmented but nobody is sure who is doing what (classic rock, AOR, active rock).
Logged

"When broadcasting over the radio, there are certain words we must omit.
Like 'BEEP' and 'BUZZ' and 'GOBBLE-GOBBLE', by gosh we can't even say shhhhhaving cream!"
kal30005
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 125


Re: WHICH ATL FORMATS ARE UNDERPERFORMING & RIPE FOR SOME "BETTER" COMPETITION
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2012, 12:11:28 PM »

I think CHR is in pretty good shape. While people complain that there aren't any "true CHRs" in Atlanta, what you really have is 2 stations that niche the CHR listeners who don't like as much R&B and Hip-Hip as most CHRs play (Star 94 and Q100) and 1 that niches away from AC that most CHRs play (Wild).

Most cities CHRs have to cover both ends of the spectrum. I actually think Atlanta is a little ahead of the curve in CHR. I think most CHR listeners from other cities would prefer on of the Atlanta stations to what they have.

Not sure how much need there is for more AOL or alternative. Most cities seem to be dropping the formats. But I do think River or somebody else could do well with a really strong classic rock format. River has proven there's a market for it but their playlist is too small and boring. And I do think 99X could find a niche if it was on a better signal, though I'd like to see them focus a little more on local and new bands.
Logged
atlantaboy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2137


Re: WHICH ATL FORMATS ARE UNDERPERFORMING & RIPE FOR SOME "BETTER" COMPETITION
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2012, 12:55:50 PM »

Not sure how much need there is for more AOL or alternative. Most cities seem to be dropping the formats.

That's not true at all - Alternative is doing very well in a majority of medium-large markets - WFNX was one of 2 Alternative stations in Boston, and the second one is doing fine
Logged
acheron82
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 503


Re: WHICH ATL FORMATS ARE UNDERPERFORMING & RIPE FOR SOME "BETTER" COMPETITION
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2012, 01:42:50 PM »


That's not true at all - Alternative is doing very well in a majority of medium-large markets - WFNX was one of 2 Alternative stations in Boston, and the second one is doing fine
[/quote]

But what's unique about the stations you mentioned above is that they have a stickily alternative base. Someone posted a write up form this site about AAA/Alternative and AC formats and how they almost intertwine with artist like FUN and Gotye.  Lets look at 99x;  Why does it suck for an "Alternative" format?  Because many alternative artist are not even played on the station.  The alternative genre has been split in two and half are on AAA stations and the other half are on Alternative stations.  The few stations you mentioned above are the exception.  Many of the indie artist are being played on AAA stations leaving the harder edge and bigger hit alt artist on the Alternative stations.  Just a theory I have that AAA and Alternative are canceling each other out.  Someone will come along and tell me I'm wrong... I CAN FEEL IT!  :-(
Logged
kal30005
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 125


Re: WHICH ATL FORMATS ARE UNDERPERFORMING & RIPE FOR SOME "BETTER" COMPETITION
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2012, 02:54:49 PM »

That's not true at all - Alternative is doing very well in a majority of medium-large markets - WFNX was one of 2 Alternative stations in Boston, and the second one is doing fine

You apparently aren't aware that WFNX, which was a great station, is probably going away. It was sold to Clear Channel last month and they will likely be changing formats in July. Most of the staff has already been laid off. The remaining Alternative station, WBOS is ranked #11 in the city.
Logged
jabba17
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2789


Re: WHICH ATL FORMATS ARE UNDERPERFORMING & RIPE FOR SOME "BETTER" COMPETITION
« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2012, 03:42:44 PM »

Oldies/Classic Top 40 is ripe for the picking. 
I put some more thought about this.  The reason for this is that one of the incumbent stations just flipped out of the format, another one is on a 250W translator (albeit a good class A/C3 equivalent one) and also overlaps considerably with the various AC players in the market, and the third one is a classic rock station in all but name. 

I think the time for 60s oldies is past, but 70s oldies still have some shelf life left. 

I've often wondered why nobody has tried a "Jack" type format in the market yet, unless Chuck 103.7 is Cox's test to speculate how it might do on a better signal.  Would Cox move Chuck to 97.1?  If that happened, it would give Cumulus an opportunity to more clearly define Rock 100.5's format vis-a-vis Project. 
Logged

"When broadcasting over the radio, there are certain words we must omit.
Like 'BEEP' and 'BUZZ' and 'GOBBLE-GOBBLE', by gosh we can't even say shhhhhaving cream!"
acheron82
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 503


Re: WHICH ATL FORMATS ARE UNDERPERFORMING & RIPE FOR SOME "BETTER" COMPETITION
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2012, 06:05:13 PM »


You apparently aren't aware that WFNX, which was a great station, is probably going away. It was sold to Clear Channel last month and they will likely be changing formats in July. Most of the staff has already been laid off. The remaining Alternative station, WBOS is ranked #11 in the city.
[/quote]



What are the ratings between the two?  I can't tell since WFNX is either not reporting or there just that low in the ratings (which I doubt).  Damn shame if you ask me because WFNX runs laps around WBOS.
Logged
BRENT
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1517

Occupation:MODEL Hobbies:RADIO DXER


Re: WHICH ATL FORMATS ARE UNDERPERFORMING & RIPE FOR SOME "BETTER" COMPETITION
« Reply #8 on: June 13, 2012, 06:54:00 PM »

Oldies/Classic Top 40 is ripe for the picking. 
I put some more thought about this.  The reason for this is that one of the incumbent stations just flipped out of the format, another one is on a 250W translator (albeit a good class A/C3 equivalent one) and also overlaps considerably with the various AC players in the market, and the third one is a classic rock station in all but name. 

I think the time for 60s oldies is past, but 70s oldies still have some shelf life left. 

I've often wondered why nobody has tried a "Jack" type format in the market yet, unless Chuck 103.7 is Cox's test to speculate how it might do on a better signal.  Would Cox move Chuck to 97.1?  If that happened, it would give Cumulus an opportunity to more clearly define Rock 100.5's format vis-a-vis Project. 


The 60s will never die call me a hippie. I was, I went to Woodstock in 69, the 60's was the best music., The SH** on the dial today is abysmal.......Very small  minded to think the 60s are past, come on man...
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.331 seconds with 20 queries.