RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 20, 2013, 12:03:37 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WAXQ 104.3 New York City January 1994  (Read 1525 times)
stevations
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 434


WAXQ 104.3 New York City January 1994
« on: June 20, 2012, 03:42:50 PM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkVsXNYX3To

Does NYC have a rock radio station now?  Was this the last rock radio station in NYC?  Should this board be called New York City rather than New York?  Years ago, who would believe that major cities would not have a rock radio station?  I remember most cities having several rock stations and most having a station called The Home Of Rock and Roll.  I guess the homeless trend has hit Rock and Roll.  Is this because rock has invented all of the songs and sounds and can't evolve anymore? 
Logged
JoeyBagODonuts
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 324


Re: WAXQ 104.3 New York City January 1994
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2012, 04:32:05 PM »

You can still hear rock on Q-104...just no songs newer than the year of that clip!  Shocked
Logged
XCountry285
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1160


Re: WAXQ 104.3 New York City January 1994
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2012, 06:05:57 PM »

There is no rock station or any alternative rock station or AAA station in NYC at all unfortunately. Hopefully someone will flip a station to that format. The last rock station was WRXP-FM on 101.9 in August of 2011 however they were not programmed that well. The last "real" rock station in NYC was 92.3 KRock in 2009. New York is New York City. Technically they're incorrect. But as the NYC Market we don't need the city it's implied because of the greatness of the area. Rock hasn't created all the sounds and invented all the songs. People did and there's still more to be invented. There's tons of great Hip Hop music, Country, Pop, Rock, Jazz, Classical, Dance, R&B, and other types of music that I forgot to mention that are excellent in their sounds. NYC needs a rock station though that plays current rock- preferably an Alternative Rock station specifically. IMO I really am tired of all of the hard rock nickelback, seether type bands they all sound the same and are all overplayed. I like rock with an edge but not when all of it sounds alike.
Logged
reelyreal
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1483


Re: WAXQ 104.3 New York City January 1994
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2012, 06:42:46 PM »

Here's my totally non-scientific observation I've come to realize over the past couple of weeks:

I've been in CHR programming and on the air for 7 years.  That entire time, up to and including today, my phones get blown up by the under-18 crowd.  NON-STOP.  I get prank phone calls from the bus!  I get kids and young adults requesting songs, winning contests, interacting with the station along with their 18-49 counterparts.

I've also beeing DJing and coordinating weddings for about 5 years.  When I start to get a feel for a couple's taste in music I always start with "what radio stations do you listen to?"  If they say that they listen to radio, the answer is ALWAYS the CHR, the Hot AC, or the country station.  Sometimes, I get Radio 104.1 here in CT as an answer.  When my couples tell me they don't listen to radio, they only listen to pandora, they're always, time after time, into one of the rock subsets.

The division of the rock genre and the distaste of certain factions to the rest of rock is perfectly suited for Pandora.  Pandora and its online bretheren cater perfectly to the niches of rock today.

I haven't seen any research on it, but in my professional experience over the past 7 years, I think the rock/indie/alternative etc. listener is much more likely to find their particular flavor of rock online.

I think rock has been most susceptible to splintering of the audience... mostly because using the word "rock" today is almost like using the word "music" to describe a genre.  IT'S HUGE, MAN!
Logged
DToTheJ
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 20114


Re: WAXQ 104.3 New York City January 1994
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2012, 06:05:16 AM »

You can still hear rock on Q-104... just no songs newer than the year of that clip!

Actually, doesn't the current form of Q-104 play Green Day, who rose to fame in 1994? (If not now, I'm sure it won't be long, at any rate...)
Logged

NOTE: If this is the last post in this thread and you wish to reply,
hit the REPLY button below... NOT the quote button above.
The result: less clutter, and less aggravation for our blind members.

Thanks!
mrbrightside
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 79


Re: WAXQ 104.3 New York City January 1994
« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2012, 08:40:14 AM »

Here's my totally non-scientific observation I've come to realize over the past couple of weeks:

I've been in CHR programming and on the air for 7 years.  That entire time, up to and including today, my phones get blown up by the under-18 crowd.  NON-STOP.  I get prank phone calls from the bus!  I get kids and young adults requesting songs, winning contests, interacting with the station along with their 18-49 counterparts.

I've also beeing DJing and coordinating weddings for about 5 years.  When I start to get a feel for a couple's taste in music I always start with "what radio stations do you listen to?"  If they say that they listen to radio, the answer is ALWAYS the CHR, the Hot AC, or the country station.  Sometimes, I get Radio 104.1 here in CT as an answer.  When my couples tell me they don't listen to radio, they only listen to pandora, they're always, time after time, into one of the rock subsets.

The division of the rock genre and the distaste of certain factions to the rest of rock is perfectly suited for Pandora.  Pandora and its online bretheren cater perfectly to the niches of rock today.

I haven't seen any research on it, but in my professional experience over the past 7 years, I think the rock/indie/alternative etc. listener is much more likely to find their particular flavor of rock online.

I think rock has been most susceptible to splintering of the audience... mostly because using the word "rock" today is almost like using the word "music" to describe a genre.  IT'S HUGE, MAN!

Yes, Pandora is great, but you have to have a smartphone, and that costs money. There is ENTIRE generation New York radio is ignoring, the kids of the baby boomers, born in the late 70s and early 80s.  We grew up listening to music in the 90s, grunge, etc., when Top 40 CHR consisted almost entirely of rock music. In fact, we were that last generation to listen to the radio for new music.  We are now being ignored completely in NYC, and it's stunning.  Yes, we like the music we grew up with, but we do not shun new music.  The "Radio" formats of Hartford (104.1), Philadelphia (104.5), and Boston (92.9) all do well in the ratings, and use a gold mixed with currents format.  Why is this not being tried in NYC?  Isn't Adults 25-34 a money demo??
Logged

One day, CBS-FM will go away, and I will tell you to get an iPod.
Barry
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1203


Re: WAXQ 104.3 New York City January 1994
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2012, 09:16:44 AM »


Yes, Pandora is great, but you have to have a smartphone, and that costs money. There is ENTIRE generation New York radio is ignoring, the kids of the baby boomers, born in the late 70s and early 80s.  We grew up listening to music in the 90s, grunge, etc., when Top 40 CHR consisted almost entirely of rock music. In fact, we were that last generation to listen to the radio for new music.  We are now being ignored completely in NYC, and it's stunning.  Yes, we like the music we grew up with, but we do not shun new music.  The "Radio" formats of Hartford (104.1), Philadelphia (104.5), and Boston (92.9) all do well in the ratings, and use a gold mixed with currents format.  Why is this not being tried in NYC?  Isn't Adults 25-34 a money demo??
I think that Jack FM, when it was on a few years ago, played a wide range of interesting rock music from the 80's to currents. Too bad it was not placed on 92.3 FM, instead of 101.1, so that it would not have been controversial, and may have still been on the air.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2012, 09:20:24 AM by Barry » Logged
XCountry285
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1160


Re: WAXQ 104.3 New York City January 1994
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2012, 10:04:09 AM »

The 90s bands are NOT classic rock. They're not that old. Even 60s music isn't classic or old yet. Why don't stations play music from the 1700's now that was a good time in music let me tell you
Logged
badjef
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2431

dichometric human


Re: WAXQ 104.3 New York City January 1994
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2012, 10:05:08 AM »

Sometimes, the product just isn't there.

The record companies have to promote what is available. It is a big risk to promote a song, or artist, that may or may not take off.

New = obscure = unknown.

Careers are made or broken by the public's preception of the song.

Jeff in Sa-ra-so-ta!
Logged

Jeff in Sa-ra-so-ta!
Home to the 2012 American League Wild Card Champion Spring Training Sa-ra-so-ta! Orioles.
www.myteamsuspenders.com and tell us you read it here for free shipping of your favorite sports team.
mrbrightside
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 79


Re: WAXQ 104.3 New York City January 1994
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2012, 10:13:25 AM »

Sometimes, the product just isn't there.

The record companies have to promote what is available. It is a big risk to promote a song, or artist, that may or may not take off.

New = obscure = unknown.

Careers are made or broken by the public's preception of the song.

Jeff in Sa-ra-so-ta!

That is why the "Radio" formats play a lot of gold, mixed with some new music.  The product is there, and this is the problem with radio.
Logged

One day, CBS-FM will go away, and I will tell you to get an iPod.
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.257 seconds with 20 queries.