RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 22, 2013, 11:59:23 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Terre Haute  (Read 4483 times)
RO77
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 91


Re: Terre Haute
« Reply #20 on: July 04, 2012, 10:22:43 AM »

Heard one of the jocks today (maybe a Wisconsin tracker?) pronounce Illinois as "Ella-noise" .   Way to know how to pronounce a state that's about half of your coverage area.  Can't wait to hear a "Tera Hut"
Logged
BobOnTheJob
Indiana's Circuit Ridin' Radio Engineer
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 3653


Re: Terre Haute
« Reply #21 on: July 05, 2012, 08:33:23 AM »

People will chanel surf from one station to another.  I dont know anyone besides radio geeks that are loyal to one station
I do...people who work in convenience stores. They pick a station and if nothing (like a ball game or talk show) drives them away, they'll still be there 2 years later.
Logged

When I started in radio in 1967, most broadcast equipment used tube technology, all recorded music was played from records on a turntable by live DJ's, there was no satellite delivery...and radio was fun.
BobOnTheJob
Indiana's Circuit Ridin' Radio Engineer
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 3653


Re: Terre Haute
« Reply #22 on: July 05, 2012, 08:39:46 AM »

Indy had this wildly popular live country show called Country Lovin' on WFMS until Cumulus came calling. Live, local and lots of listener interaction....the kind of listener bonding that makes radio mean something to people. Of course, that requires a warm body in the air chair from 7PM-midnight which probably means Voice Tracking or another syndicated show. 
Logged

When I started in radio in 1967, most broadcast equipment used tube technology, all recorded music was played from records on a turntable by live DJ's, there was no satellite delivery...and radio was fun.
Hoosierky
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 384


Re: Terre Haute
« Reply #23 on: July 05, 2012, 02:10:25 PM »

Indy had this wildly popular live country show called Country Lovin' on WFMS until Cumulus came calling. Live, local and lots of listener interaction....the kind of listener bonding that makes radio mean something to people. Of course, that requires a warm body in the air chair from 7PM-midnight which probably means Voice Tracking or another syndicated show. 

Your right Bob.But remember that CL was also syndicated to other stations for a while.
Logged
BobOnTheJob
Indiana's Circuit Ridin' Radio Engineer
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 3653


Re: Terre Haute
« Reply #24 on: July 05, 2012, 06:45:34 PM »

Indy had this wildly popular live country show called Country Lovin' on WFMS until Cumulus came calling. Live, local and lots of listener interaction....the kind of listener bonding that makes radio mean something to people. Of course, that requires a warm body in the air chair from 7PM-midnight which probably means Voice Tracking or another syndicated show. 

Your right Bob.But remember that CL was also syndicated to other stations for a while.
Good point Hoosiersky...few stations and not for a long time, but indeed it was. I was disappointed when 97.1 in Indy didn't bring that one along with the rest of the class of Shadeland Avenue.
 
Logged

When I started in radio in 1967, most broadcast equipment used tube technology, all recorded music was played from records on a turntable by live DJ's, there was no satellite delivery...and radio was fun.
RadioGM44
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 10


Re: Terre Haute
« Reply #25 on: July 11, 2012, 05:50:11 PM »

More Changes in Terre Haute.  Frank Rush Moves across town to Midwest Communications.
« Last Edit: July 11, 2012, 06:03:05 PM by RadioGM44 » Logged
busterluck
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 183


Re: Terre Haute
« Reply #26 on: July 13, 2012, 06:54:04 PM »

Just hiring another local for Midwest is not bringing anything new to the market. If existing talent in TH was any good, they would be long gone for bigger markets and more money. WDWQ will not win with local recycled announcers.  when I heard Rush, he just did not have the cutting edge on the air.  Midwest needs to open the pocketbook and bring in fresh voices.
Logged
N_D_Radioguy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 607


Re: Terre Haute
« Reply #27 on: July 15, 2012, 09:28:52 PM »

So, for those of you scoring at home...

This thread has griped that Midwest's approach is not local enough AND that it's too local.

So which is it?

... and if you were scoring at home, you wouldn't have time to be part of this thread.
Logged
RO77
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 91


Re: Terre Haute
« Reply #28 on: July 16, 2012, 06:56:22 AM »

So, for those of you scoring at home...

This thread has griped that Midwest's approach is not local enough AND that it's too local.

So which is it?

... and if you were scoring at home, you wouldn't have time to be part of this thread.

I think you might have misunderstood what Busterluck meant above (not that I agree 100% with it).  Think he meant they should hire more full time talent from out of market and move them to Terre Haute, and not voicetrack in from their other clusters.

I'm sorry, if you seriously want to beat Hi 99 with your brand new country station, having 2]two dayparts tracked out of Wisconsin or Michigan is NOT the way to do it.  If you have to track, then fine, but use someone local that listeners still have the opportunity to interact with at remotes, events, etc.

Midwest is making the same blunder with x95.9 .  They have THREE dayparts tracked out of market.  Makes absolutely zero sense.   It's not even giving their new stations a fair chance.

Might be one thing if the piped in shows were amazing, but none of them are.  Dry, boring and all sound rushed.  That won't get the job done against Emmis' live and local weekday lineups.
Logged
umfan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 435


Re: Terre Haute
« Reply #29 on: July 16, 2012, 11:54:50 AM »

Just hiring another local for Midwest is not bringing anything new to the market. If existing talent in TH was any good, they would be long gone for bigger markets and more money. WDWQ will not win with local recycled announcers.  when I heard Rush, he just did not have the cutting edge on the air.  Midwest needs to open the pocketbook and bring in fresh voices.

I disagree with the second sentence in this quote. There is decent talent in TH that may stay because they've put down roots here, have extended family in the area or a spouse with a good job in another field.

I can't argue with what Midwest is doing. They are going to make gradual changes and the product with improve from the resource starved product that Crossroads had on the air.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.159 seconds with 20 queries.