RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 25, 2013, 08:50:11 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2  (Read 12315 times)
Will
Burlington trash talker
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1727


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #120 on: June 28, 2012, 02:00:06 PM »

Dude, they've been on the air for three hours, and have done nothing except segue records.  You're going to gauge them on that?  Are you serious? 
Logged
pjc1961
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2122


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #121 on: June 28, 2012, 02:18:05 PM »

I don't know who is doing the morning show for CBS's top-40 WXRK-92.3 ("Now") in New York, but I wouldn't be completely surprised if 103.3 (whatever call letters it gets) simulcasts it.

That could save a lot of money.

On the other hand, how about a "Maximum Hitz" morning show with reduced commercials and little (if any) talk/news/weather/traffic??

Current 92~3 Now New York lineup consists of:

Mornings: Lil Cee & Sarah Lee*see new message below*
Middays: Eutopia
Afternoons: Micki Gamez
Nights: Zann
Late Nights: DJ Toro or other jocks/weekenders

I don't think they'll simulcast - if Nick Cannon was still there...maybe. The current morning show is just trying to find their sea legs for "Now" (pun intended Cheesy). In fact, newly installed PD Rick Gillette has had to practically make over the entire staff - the original weekday lineup that started on 92~3 Now in March 2009 is all gone.

The Maximum Hits/Hitz idea is a fair one. I don't know how much "talk-time" Carson Daly gets on his Amp Radio L.A. morning show, but it's likely not as much as the KIIS-FM Ryan Seacrest show.  

*Well, the morning show landscape has changed at 92~3 Now NYC as Ty Bentli (last of KBIG L.A.) joins for mornings starting Thu. 7/5/12 - AllAccess.com piece here.

CBS hasn't made a habit of syndicating its CHR-based morning shows, though...at least, not yet.

Even in other formats, I can't think of many syndicated CBS morning shows - although that will change with the upcoming CBS Sports Radio Network, for example.
Logged
Joseph_Gallant
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1006


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #122 on: June 28, 2012, 03:30:03 PM »

Quote from: Reelyreal wrote:

Yes, CBS should go CHR.  It should have happened on WBMX.

I agree.

Had WBMX-104.1 gone Top-40, it would have only required a tweak in the music and maybe the presentation. No announcers would have had to have been let go.
Logged
ned
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 81


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #123 on: June 28, 2012, 03:31:33 PM »

Bold move on the part of CBS....however, I give it about one year before the CHR is dropped for a simulcast of WBZ-AM.  WODS had solid numbers and billing, demographics aside.  NO ONE in the 18-34 demo is listening to radio to hear the hits.  Further, they are splitting an audience with WBMX.  I love good top 40 radio, so we'll see what happens.  If the live and local jocks actually happen it'll be great for those of us that follow the industry, but, maybe aside from the AM drive, I don't think the average listener cares if the jock is the Man-in-The-Moon and voice tracking as well.
Logged
Turnpike Tuner
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 694


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #124 on: June 28, 2012, 03:35:29 PM »

Bold move on the part of CBS....however, I give it about one year before the CHR is dropped for a simulcast of WBZ-AM.  WODS had solid numbers and billing, demographics aside.

From what I read, it was the billing that caused the flip - CBS want's the money that WXKS/WJMN is bringing in for Clear Channel. If the ratings were there...was it just the case of sales being lazy and convincing the powers that be to flip it to make their lives easier? Wouldn't be the 1st time that happened...
Logged
Lee Anderson
leethalweapon
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 809

Occupation:Transfer Suite Operator/Board Op


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #125 on: June 28, 2012, 03:44:59 PM »

Would Clear Channel compete with themselves with a CHR on 101.7? That would be the last possibility of what would end up there

Recently, CCM&E tightened up the playlist and relaunched MIX 102.9 as 102.9 NOW. This is designed to squeeze our competition against KISS 106.1.
Logged

Radio station employee...
Amateur photographer...
Cat slave...
Sarcasm expert...
Annual USA visitor...
leegart
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 78


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #126 on: June 28, 2012, 04:26:07 PM »

bostonradio tweet
103.3 changes to Top 40 format called AMP...Classic 60's,70's,80's moves to HD2 starting tomorrow(6/28)
As all format changes are, it is a money based decision, CBS is going after a younger audience, the music at their station did creep up in years,  60's is great but after awhile the audience get older.  Lets face it how many big band stations are there now?

The older audience has an attachment to and a tradition of listening to the radio and disposable to income to buy the products advertised. The kids listen to streaming music on smart phones, ipods or satellite radio, have no attachment to broadcast radio, and especially given the economy and student loan debt, less disposable income to buy advertised products.

Let's see how amped CBS is going to be given these facts and the bad books to come! I'll say it again: They didn't learn JACK when they flipped CBS-FM in New York from Oldies/Classic Hits!
Logged
fmradio1
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 365


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #127 on: June 28, 2012, 04:27:06 PM »

A couple of points...

FWIH, billing has been a problem for a long time.  Even with the musical tweaks, billing lagged behind it's ratings.  6+ doesn't tell the story.  25-54's were not good.  Something needed to happen.  

Everyone is focusing on AMP taking on Kiss and that Mix should have been the station sacrificed.  Why?  They have decent cume as is, and younger (yet still adult) demos.  Touching that would be insane.  If anything, with AMP tangling with Kiss and Jam'n, it allows Mix to focus a little more pop/rock, skew a little older, and take on Magic.  106.7 has been struggling with becoming more contemporary.  Mix can tangle with them for the older female listener.  

At the end of the day, AMP doesn't have to beat Kiss.  Not even close.  It just needs to be a preset for the demo.  Once it's established, it's cume will be higher (by quite a bit...just watch) and (obviously) the demos will be younger than when they were classic hits.  Agencies will eagerly buy that.  And that's the whole point.
Logged
Mrtraveler01
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 87


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #128 on: June 28, 2012, 04:36:54 PM »

How much do you guys want to bet that CC will flip 101.7 to oldies when they get a hold of WFNX?
Logged
encarta95
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1458


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #129 on: June 28, 2012, 04:46:16 PM »

How much do you guys want to bet that CC will flip 101.7 to oldies when they get a hold of WFNX?

But Oldies/classic hits is already directly served in the market by WROR. I'm thinking Jack FM.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.241 seconds with 19 queries.