RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 22, 2013, 09:11:59 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2  (Read 12223 times)
Peter Q. George (K1XRB)
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1884

Occupation: Broadcast Engineer/AV Administrator Hobbies: Ham radio, DX'ing


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #130 on: June 28, 2012, 04:47:24 PM »

How much do you guys want to bet that CC will flip 101.7 to oldies when they get a hold of WFNX?
I wouldn't be surprised at all.  It would make sense.  It wouldn't hurt by bringing back a few of the WODS on-air jocks and copious streaming services.  The audience would be there for the taking!!!  We shall see.......
Logged
fmradio1
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 364


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #131 on: June 28, 2012, 04:53:20 PM »

I wouldn't be surprised at all.  It would make sense.  It wouldn't hurt by bringing back a few of the WODS on-air jocks and copious streaming services.  The audience would be there for the taking!!!  We shall see.......

What audience?  55+?  CC doesn't want that.  Like WODS, they would have to compete with WROR, which has a better overall signal than WFNX.  Right now CC has a lot invested in 1200 in the way of local hosts & producers, along with the big national shows.  101.7 will give Talk 1200 a better signal and with no music rights fees.  I'd be shocked if 101.7 and 1200 aren't simulcasting in a few weeks.
Logged
brlmedia
Brad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 263

Radio is in my blood!


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #132 on: June 28, 2012, 05:47:22 PM »

i see the new AMP facebook page has its share of positive and negative comments..
Logged
leegart
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 78


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #133 on: June 28, 2012, 06:53:10 PM »

The HD-2 stream of the old WODS has a lot of double repetition of jingles and occasional dead air spots. Anybody watching the computer?
Logged
danikayser84
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 750


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #134 on: June 28, 2012, 07:02:40 PM »

If 101.7 does go to a simulcast of Talk 1200, when/if the simulcast is split, does anyone see 1200 going Fox Sports or Urban or being sold off?
Logged
Retro
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1742


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #135 on: June 28, 2012, 07:42:28 PM »

When they tried this with WHTT, they didn't blow up an established heritage radio station to do it, they were up against a much more loosely run Kiss 108, and Jam'n 94.5 didn't exist. and they STILL failed. This will go down as a massive blunder.


WZOU(Zoo) was already on the air for a few months when WHTT came on.

No, WHTT "Hit Radio" was on the air in early '83. WZOU didn't come on the scene until '84.
Logged
blackgold
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 632


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #136 on: June 28, 2012, 09:29:03 PM »

Oh, just great!  WODS blows up its oldies format and goes top 40 CHR!  This is gross!
Logged
Nick
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 6400


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #137 on: June 28, 2012, 09:30:22 PM »

It's interesting how "103.3" was a national trending topic on Twitter at noon today. First time I ever saw a frequency as a trending topic on Twitter.
Logged
P Terrance Dactyl
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 119


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #138 on: June 28, 2012, 09:50:48 PM »

Quote
From Signpost:
When they tried this with WHTT, they didn't blow up an established heritage radio station to do it, they were up against a much more loosely run Kiss 108, and Jam'n 94.5 didn't exist. and they STILL failed. This will go down as a massive blunder.
Just a little history lesson.  In the 80's CBS was looking to go to an oldies format in boston like they had in NY.  Back then WHTT was the only property CBS owned in Boston. (pre-Westinghouse purchase of CBS) 

There was some NY corporate poltics involved and WHTT was blown up but instead of going to oldies a coup occurred at Black Rock and the loser was sent to Boston with a format designed to fail...the format failed...and when it did the loser in the corporate battle was fired and WODS was born. 

The long transition to oldies had nothing to do with WHTT "failing" as a CHR, it had to do with CBS trying to establish an oldies format nationally.  Yesterday's demolition of WODS, which IMHO could be called a Heritage Station, has everything to do with demographics getting too old to be attractive to advertisers. 

Unfortunately the change to CHR was done at the expense of some very talented professionals that certainly could make a CHR format a ratings and advertising leader.

Let the debate begin!
Logged
pjc1961
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2115


Re: breaking BRW 103.3 to amp format, 60s-70s-80s to hd2
« Reply #139 on: June 29, 2012, 01:42:55 AM »

From the RAMP newsletter of 6/28/12 regarding the players involved in the musical changeover to CHR:

The launch of 103.3 Amp Radio will be led locally by CBS Radio Boston VP of Programming Mike Thomas, working closely with CBS Radio VP of Top 40 Programming Michael Martin, who tells RAMP, "Get ready, Boston... game on!" Martin profusely thanks his longtime cohort "Jazzy Jim" Archer, APD/MD of [edit: rhythmic leaning CHR] KMVQ (99.7 Now)/San Francisco who has been working tirelessly behind the scenes getting Amp Radio's music mix sounding just right. "Jazzy has one of the best set of music ears in the country," says Martin, "and I can't think of a better person to help us piss everyone off."

Link to 6/28/12 RAMP newsletter here. (Fortunately it's the first item. WAAF re-upping with Greg Hill is item #2.)
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.334 seconds with 19 queries.