RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 20, 2013, 11:33:06 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Boston June 2012 PPM  (Read 3637 times)
recto101
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3146


Boston June 2012 PPM
« on: July 10, 2012, 07:10:16 PM »

http://www.radio-info.com/markets/boston

WBZ-AM gets a 5.2 in the books.
Logged
leegart
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 78


Re: Boston June 2012 PPM
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2012, 07:33:25 PM »

One wonders why CBS didn't flip 104.5 instead of 103.3. I guess it must be all about the billing not the ratings or the demographics of the audience.
Logged
reelyreal
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1483


Re: Boston June 2012 PPM
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2012, 07:46:32 PM »

It should be noted that the June 2012 numbers for Boston are NOT out.  You're looking at the May numbers.

Boston numbers come out tomorrow.
Logged
NHRadio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1130


Re: Boston June 2012 PPM
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2012, 08:36:57 PM »

That's exactly right. Ratings are irrelevant if you're making your numbers.

One wonders why CBS didn't flip 104.5 instead of 103.3. I guess it must be all about the billing not the ratings or the demographics of the audience.
Logged
Media Watchdog
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 32


Re: Boston June 2012 PPM
« Reply #4 on: July 10, 2012, 08:52:51 PM »

While it is true that revenue ultimately wins the day, there is generally a strong correlation between ratings and revenue, particularly if you are talking about ratings in key demographics. There are mitigating factors. Ratings are much more important for agency and national sales where the product is more of a commodity sell. For retail, particularly those single station buys where an advertiser is sold on the concept of radio, it is easier to talk about the type of audience and the fit with their products. In those cases, an advertiser can make up for a lack of ratings sophistication by monitoring the cash register and seeing if the plan is working (as long as they give it enough time...).

Of course there are exceptions. MIKE-FM for instance, did stronger ratings than their revenue would lead one to believe. A big reason was that the jockless format made it difficult to sell personality endorsements, a significant drawback when competing Matty, Howie Carr, Loren and Wally, etc. "Oldies" had some inherent challenges. While I have not seen Boston ratings in quite some time, my guess is that is skewed to the older side of 25-54 and older. Additionally, I have spoken to a number of marketers who are reticent to link their product to something called "Oldies", hence the prevalence of "Classic Hits".
Logged
CTListener
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2503


Re: Boston June 2012 PPM
« Reply #5 on: July 10, 2012, 09:10:51 PM »

One wonders why CBS didn't flip 104.5 instead of 103.3. I guess it must be all about the billing not the ratings or the demographics of the audience.

WXLO wouldn't appreciate CBS telling it what to do.
Logged
NHRadio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1130


Re: Boston June 2012 PPM
« Reply #6 on: July 10, 2012, 10:53:05 PM »

While it is true that revenue ultimately wins the day, there is generally a strong correlation between ratings and revenue.

Yes but...ratings are only useful as a tool to earn revenue. All infomercial or home shopping TV channels can be profitable while having miniscule if any ratings.
I think we're seeing the very beginnings of Radio having to reinvent itself. Jukebox-type stations are going the way of the landline telephone.
Broadcasters will have to find a way to keep listeners engaged, and talk/sports is a great way to do that. Oldies/Classic Rock is feeling the damage done by beating the same 300 records to death for the last 10 years.
Feel free to tell me I'm full of it. I'm married...I'm used to it.  Cheesy
Logged
raccoonradio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 13220


Re: Boston June 2012 PPM
« Reply #7 on: July 11, 2012, 01:33:08 AM »

Yes assume you mean 104.1
Logged
DToTheJ
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 20114


Re: Boston June 2012 PPM
« Reply #8 on: July 11, 2012, 05:15:15 AM »

It should be noted that the June 2012 numbers for Boston are NOT out.  You're looking at the May numbers. Boston numbers come out tomorrow.

For whatever reason, there must be a one-day delay in the delivery of the June PPM numbers. The New York ratings, which would have come out on a Monday, were actually released Tuesday (yesterday).
Logged

NOTE: If this is the last post in this thread and you wish to reply,
hit the REPLY button below... NOT the quote button above.
The result: less clutter, and less aggravation for our blind members.

Thanks!
rockcaptain
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 322


Re: Boston June 2012 PPM
« Reply #9 on: July 11, 2012, 07:02:54 AM »

It should be noted that the June 2012 numbers for Boston are NOT out.  You're looking at the May numbers. Boston numbers come out tomorrow.

For whatever reason, there must be a one-day delay in the delivery of the June PPM numbers.

July 4th holiday is the reason for the one day delay.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.295 seconds with 19 queries.