RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 22, 2013, 10:06:52 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Automation Question  (Read 608 times)
brian5
Guest
Re: Automation Question
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2005, 06:28:39 AM »

That was it...The Phantom.

> >>>I think it was called the ?Shadow? mentioned.  I remember
> the original Prophet system which I
> > think is the makers of the Nexgen2.  Can't recall what
> > station was using it though when I saw it.  
> >
> > I thought of another system today that I saw once (never
> > used myself), I think it was called the ?Shadow?.  Reality
>
> > 101 had the system when it came on the air up in
> Birmingham.
> >  It was good on live assist, or when left alone to be a
> > jukebox, but it took forever to get to work with voice
> > tracking like they wanted it to.  I think they ended up
> > switching systems when Blackbird, crow, whatever it was
> from
> > Huntsville bought the station and flipped it to the 101.1
> > The Spot.  It might not have been till they moved the
> > studios to the Pepper building though.  Crawford bought
> the
> > station and changed the automation system again...can't
> > remember what to though.
> >
>

______________
Brian

Logged
Hart
Guest
Re: Automation Question
« Reply #11 on: December 21, 2005, 07:44:26 AM »

Phantom is great for a satellite fed "radio station in a box."  I really can't stand it for live assist stuff.

> That was it...The Phantom.
>
> > >>>I think it was called the ?Shadow? mentioned.  I
> remember
> > the original Prophet system which I
> > > think is the makers of the Nexgen2.  Can't recall what
> > > station was using it though when I saw it.  
> > >
> > > I thought of another system today that I saw once (never
>
> > > used myself), I think it was called the ?Shadow?.
> Reality
> >
> > > 101 had the system when it came on the air up in
> > Birmingham.
> > >  It was good on live assist, or when left alone to be a
> > > jukebox, but it took forever to get to work with voice
> > > tracking like they wanted it to.  I think they ended up
> > > switching systems when Blackbird, crow, whatever it was
> > from
> > > Huntsville bought the station and flipped it to the
> 101.1
> > > The Spot.  It might not have been till they moved the
> > > studios to the Pepper building though.  Crawford bought
> > the
> > > station and changed the automation system again...can't
> > > remember what to though.
> > >
> >
>
Logged
Sir1350
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 5


Re: Automation Question
« Reply #12 on: December 21, 2005, 11:47:49 PM »

Heres one for ya,

We were using a two studio setup up till 2003, the newer studio was using Cartworks running a music log part of the day with commercials, during this daypart the Cartworks would trigger a tone that would kick off a Schaffer 903 some 30 miles away at the main studio, this would play the main studio spots. It would also work in reverse when the programming was originating from the main studio. Since late 2003 we have just used the Cartworks for everything. How many of you know of the Schaffer 903? FYI: it was all the rage in the mid 60's, utilizing instacarts and carousel systems for spots and reel to reels for music, this system was really ahead of it's time back then. If I am not mistaken I believe the original asking price for these was well over $40,000 dollars. Today if you can find a 903 most stations will let you have them for free.
Logged
romer979fm
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2091


Re: Automation Question
« Reply #13 on: December 22, 2005, 06:55:24 AM »

How many of you know of the Schaffer 903? FYI: it was all the
 rage in the mid 60's, utilizing instacarts and carousel
 systems for spots and reel to reels for music, this system
 was really ahead of it's time back then.

 We ran 92Q Nashville off a 903 in the mid 70's...6 reel to reels...
 2 "audiofile" cart machines for spots/jingles (stepchild of the instacart...  
 45 carts...three heads/capstans...one for carts 1-15, 1 for 16-31,
 1 for 32-45.  not even close to random-access.  It also had three "carousels"
 that each held 36 carts...playing them in sequential order (skip a cart?
 pull it halfway out to daypart).  And of course, two huge cart machines for
 time announce...one with odd...one with even times...locally recorded.)
 The 903 gave you 19 possible audio sources...we used all but 17 and 18.
 When 92Q went live in 1978, I kept ALL the manuals/schematics, and took
 LOTS of photos.  Anyone remember the huge PAPER TAPE printer/encoder they
 used?   Noisy!
 

______________
but wait...there's more!

Logged

not trying to be the smartest person in the room...maybe later
brian5
Guest
Re: Automation Question
« Reply #14 on: December 22, 2005, 07:05:33 AM »

This wasn't at Thunder 92.7 was it?  I knew they had two studios at one time, if not still today.

> Heres one for ya,
>
> We were using a two studio setup up till 2003, the newer
> studio was using Cartworks running a music log part of the
> day with commercials, during this daypart the Cartworks
> would trigger a tone that would kick off a Schaffer 903 some
> 30 miles away at the main studio, this would play the main
> studio spots. It would also work in reverse when the
> programming was originating from the main studio. Since late
> 2003 we have just used the Cartworks for everything. How
> many of you know of the Schaffer 903? FYI: it was all the
> rage in the mid 60's, utilizing instacarts and carousel
> systems for spots and reel to reels for music, this system
> was really ahead of it's time back then. If I am not
> mistaken I believe the original asking price for these was
> well over $40,000 dollars. Today if you can find a 903 most
> stations will let you have them for free.
>

______________
Brian

Logged
Kent
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4208


Re: Automation Question
« Reply #15 on: December 22, 2005, 07:19:07 PM »

Gotta agree with you on Maestro.  Don't like it at all.  DCS for Windows built on a Scott Studios platform.  The worst of all worlds!  I love Scott Studios and currently use DCS and like it, but Maestro irritates me.  AV Air is easy to run, but it's not very complex, and I wouldn't walk away from it for long because of its tendency to crash.  One of the station's I'm at now uses Cartready.  I wish it had DCS like our oldies station!
Logged
Nesta
Guest
Re: Automation Question
« Reply #16 on: December 25, 2005, 10:14:51 AM »

> Phantom is great for a satellite fed "radio station in a
> box."  I really can't stand it for live assist stuff.
>
> > That was it...The Phantom.
> >
> > > >>>I think it was called the ?Shadow? mentioned.  I
> > remember
> > > the original Prophet system which I
> > > > think is the makers of the Nexgen2.  Can't recall what
>
> > > > station was using it though when I saw it.  
> > > >
> > > > I thought of another system today that I saw once
> (never
> >
> > > > used myself), I think it was called the ?Shadow?.
> > Reality
> > >
> > > > 101 had the system when it came on the air up in
> > > Birmingham.
> > > >  It was good on live assist, or when left alone to be
> a
> > > > jukebox, but it took forever to get to work with voice
>
> > > > tracking like they wanted it to.  I think they ended
> up
> > > > switching systems when Blackbird, crow, whatever it
> was
> > > from
> > > > Huntsville bought the station and flipped it to the
> > 101.1
> > > > The Spot.  It might not have been till they moved the
> > > > studios to the Pepper building though.  Crawford
> bought
> > > the
> > > > station and changed the automation system
> again...can't
> > > > remember what to though.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

I would rather play from cassette tapes than deal with the Phantom like I have to everyday. Somebody shoot me!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.283 seconds with 19 queries.