RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 21, 2013, 06:48:31 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 1620 AM South Bend must be stunting-any ideas???  (Read 409 times)
cartleague
Guest
1620 AM South Bend must be stunting-any ideas???
« on: February 03, 2006, 07:34:47 AM »

Tuesday-Thursday, I have noticed that 1620 AM was simulcasting 1580 AM ESPN Sports radio.  This morning, they have changed to a slightly distorted sound of U93.  They must be stunting. Any ideas or agreements with this?  So, what is AMP's ultimate plan for 1620?
Logged
denningsjon_
Guest
Re: 1620 AM South Bend must be stunting-any ideas???
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2006, 09:48:37 AM »

> Tuesday-Thursday, I have noticed that 1620 AM was
> simulcasting 1580 AM ESPN Sports radio.  This morning, they
> have changed to a slightly distorted sound of U93.  They
> must be stunting. Any ideas or agreements with this?  So,
> what is AMP's ultimate plan for 1620?
>
AMP... ultimate plan... LOL!!!

Edited by castingcrowns on 02/03/06 03:48 PM.

Logged
sheop
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3


Re: 1620 AM South Bend must be stunting-any ideas???
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2006, 06:23:11 PM »

> > Tuesday-Thursday, I have noticed that 1620 AM was
> > simulcasting 1580 AM ESPN Sports radio.  This morning,
> they
> > have changed to a slightly distorted sound of U93.  They
> > must be stunting. Any ideas or agreements with this?  So,
> > what is AMP's ultimate plan for 1620?
> >
> AMP... ultimate plan... LOL!!!
>
 1620 simulcasted U93 all day today and 1490 was carrying ESPN radio. At noon 1490 changed to a simulcast of U93 as well and 1580 was carrying the last hour of Cowherd after Sean Steirs show ended.
Logged
magicmk
Guest
Re: 1620 AM South Bend must be stunting-any ideas???
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2006, 07:45:55 PM »

> > > Tuesday-Thursday, I have noticed that 1620 AM was
> > > simulcasting 1580 AM ESPN Sports radio.  This morning,
> > they
> > > have changed to a slightly distorted sound of U93.  They
>
> > > must be stunting. Any ideas or agreements with this?
> So,
> > > what is AMP's ultimate plan for 1620?
> > >
> > AMP... ultimate plan... LOL!!!
> >
>  1620 simulcasted U93 all day today and 1490 was carrying
> ESPN radio. At noon 1490 changed to a simulcast of U93 as
> well and 1580 was carrying the last hour of Cowherd after
> Sean Steirs show ended.
>

If this is stunting, it's the craziest stunt I ever recall hearing of.  Maybe this is the new "Variety formats" format... "We'll do anything."

This is all starting to make even WSMK look like a well organized operation.  You wonder if maybe it'll end up in some brilliant way that has a logical explanation, but I seriously doubt it.
Logged
smackman
Guest
Re: 1620 AM South Bend must be stunting-any ideas???
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2006, 08:03:45 AM »

Just so you all know, during the Sean Stires Show (10-12) ESPN is played on 1490 in case people want to listen to Cowherd, or what ever programming ESPN has.  I have heard them mention this during the day on 1580.  That is why the programming changes.  It changes back to music at 12 noon.  This is something I have heard there for months, as I listen to ESPN on 1490. In addition to this, during ND sports broadcasts ESPN is aired on 1490 when games are on 1580 so that people can listen to ESPN in case they don't want to hear the ND stuff.  I am not a big ND Women's BB fan, and sometimes ESPN 1000 doesn't come in good here so I listen to it when I want to hear Sports Center. Just wanted you to know...also, if all of this is going on an AM station, I echo the thought of another poster in a previous thread....Who cares?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.251 seconds with 20 queries.