RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 25, 2013, 08:22:45 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: David G. Hall at "State of the Industry" talk  (Read 1882 times)
zumahans
Guest
Re: David G. Hall at "State of the Industry" talk
« Reply #10 on: September 20, 2006, 03:52:52 PM »

---->So you're saying the druming up fake documents from known low-level political hacks to embarass a sitting president during an election has been good for business?

That and the rest of the broadcast. Look at the numbers. CBS News has a half hour a night that wallops Fox News over 24 hours, every day.

And in case Faux News has missed the story: your sitting president doesn't need anyone's help to embarrass hisself.

Logged
livingfruitvirus
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1933


Re: David G. Hall at "State of the Industry" talk
« Reply #11 on: September 20, 2006, 05:14:01 PM »

"Phil, don't you hit that tard!"
Logged
ChannelFlipper
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1721


Re: David G. Hall at "State of the Industry" talk
« Reply #12 on: September 20, 2006, 08:47:54 PM »

---->So you're saying the druming up fake documents from known low-level political hacks to embarass a sitting president during an election has been good for business?

That and the rest of the broadcast. Look at the numbers. CBS News has a half hour a night that wallops Fox News over 24 hours, every day.

And in case Faux News has missed the story: your sitting president doesn't need anyone's help to embarrass hisself.



Good gosh do you guys ever quit focussing on your enemy president?

We are talking about the quality of the CBS fake news gathering and presentation and you compare it to the president as if that is even relevant - without even denying the crappiness of the news product!

Congratulations! By comparing Bush to CBS news, you've done something that is very hard to do - make him look good by comparison!

Wow. Get a grip.
Logged
zumahans
Guest
Re: David G. Hall at "State of the Industry" talk
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2006, 08:56:14 PM »

Address the facts, Jack.

CBS News: 8 million viewers a night.

Fox News Channel: 1.2 million viewers in any given 24-hour period.

KNX: dumbest all-news radio station in the world.

Logged
OldGringo
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 830

Misanthrope


Re: Erroneous data agan .
« Reply #14 on: September 21, 2006, 12:10:27 AM »

For the record, Fox News Channel is a loser, and dropping like a rock.

It's total 24-hour total viewership is less than a third of Katie Couric's little bitty half hour on CBS.



Fox News Average persons is 1.2 million, not cume. The weekly cume is between 55 and 60 million. 60,000,000.
Logged
RL
RKO Inside
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 36


Re: David G. Hall at "State of the Industry" talk
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2006, 04:29:15 AM »

And that's our show. Say good night Gracie. "Good night Gracie"...
Logged
zumahans
Guest
Re: David G. Hall at "State of the Industry" talk
« Reply #16 on: September 21, 2006, 09:09:27 AM »

So the Fox weekly cume, for a 24/7 cable broadcast, is 60 million.

The CBS Evening News weekly cume, for 2-1/2 hours per week, is 40 million. For just one half hour show, 5 nights a week.

Fox is a pipsqueak, with fans who need to constantly bellyache about their importance.
Logged
OldGringo
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 830

Misanthrope


Re: Wrong again, Sam.
« Reply #17 on: September 21, 2006, 10:42:25 AM »

So the Fox weekly cume, for a 24/7 cable broadcast, is 60 million.

The CBS Evening News weekly cume, for 2-1/2 hours per week, is 40 million. For just one half hour show, 5 nights a week.

Fox is a pipsqueak, with fans who need to constantly bellyache about their importance.

CBS Evening news cume is less than 2.5 x the nightly viewership... not 40 million.
Logged
mostb1
Guest
Re: David G. Hall at "State of the Industry" talk
« Reply #18 on: September 21, 2006, 10:48:17 AM »

So much for growth at the one 30 minute program, the CBS Evening News. On Tuesday night it barely attracted 6 million viewers now that Katie Couric looks like she has become a liabilty to the failing CBS News operation. Not unexpected.

COURIC SLIPPING AWAY: ABC 'WORLD NEWS' 2X AUDIENCE OF COURIC 'CBS EVENING NEWS' ON WEDNESDAY IN NYC AND LOS ANGELES... IN CHICAGO, ABC PULLED 4X COURIC AUDIENCE; ABC OVER CBS 3X IN PHILLY....

CABLE NEWS RACE
TUES. SEPT 19, 2006
VIEWERS

FOXNEWS O'REILLY 1,932,000
FOXNEWS SHEP SMITH 1,405,000
FNC HANNITY/COLMES 1,396,000
FNC BRIT HUME 1,381,000
FNC GRETA 1,284,000
CNN WOLF BLITZER 912,000
CNN LOU DOBBS 848,000
CNN COOPER 790,000
CNN ZAHN 783,000
CNNHN GRACE 770,000
CNN KING 706,000
MSNBC SCARBOROUGH 444,000
MSNBC OLBERMANN 444,000
CNNHN BECK 425,000
MSNBC HARDBALL 413,000
Logged
zumahans
Guest
Re: David G. Hall at "State of the Industry" talk
« Reply #19 on: September 21, 2006, 11:12:02 AM »

----->COURIC SLIPPING AWAY: ABC 'WORLD NEWS' 2X AUDIENCE OF COURIC 'CBS EVENING NEWS' ON WEDNESDAY IN NYC AND LOS ANGELES... IN CHICAGO, ABC PULLED 4X COURIC AUDIENCE; ABC OVER CBS 3X IN PHILLY....

Thank you for confirming my point. The weakest of the three network newscasts has a larger audience than O'Reilly, Shep, Brit, Cannity/Holmes, and Van Suffer combined.

Add in ABC and NBC, and just the evening network newscasts have about five times the viewership of Faux news primetime.

NPR has an audience about 10 times the size of Faux news on a daily weekday.

1.9 million homes for Loofah Boy? More people watch the 6pm news on KMEX channel 34 (!).

Faux News is a ratings pipsqueak despite the best hopes of people who cannot find the caps lock key.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.636 seconds with 19 queries.