RadioDiscussions.com

 
Login June 19, 2013, 09:46:08 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Spring Butt Wuppin'  (Read 603 times)
Ron
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 21


Spring Butt Wuppin'
« on: July 18, 2005, 03:20:21 PM »

Ahhhh, CTO, not the same purrrr it used to have. Well, atleast they can still lick themselves and land on their feet.

I would love to see the breakdowns 25-54 Mornings.

Maybe some one could post the ranks? Please?
Logged
John1
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1698


Re: Spring
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2005, 04:28:12 AM »

> Ahhhh, CTO, not the same purrrr it used to have. Well,
> atleast they can still lick themselves and land on their
> feet.
>
> I would love to see the breakdowns 25-54 Mornings.
>
> Maybe some one could post the ranks? Please?
>

Is coming in 2nd 3/10ths of a point below the Hawk really a "butt whippin'"? Would think ZZO's the one with the red backend, now behind LEV.  In the AM race Oldies 1470 is almost tied with WAEB now, would say now successful in replacing their popular standards format of a few years back.  WHOL is more of a player than I ever remember.  YSP is the top non-market station - is it the rock, or Howard - guess we'll see by next year.
Logged
radiophile
Guest
Re: Spring
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2005, 06:12:12 AM »

> Is coming in 2nd 3/10ths of a point below the Hawk really a
> "butt whippin'"? Would think ZZO's the one with the red
> backend, now behind LEV.  In the AM race Oldies 1470 is
> almost tied with WAEB now, would say now successful in
> replacing their popular standards format of a few years
> back.  WHOL is more of a player than I ever remember.  YSP
> is the top non-market station - is it the rock, or Howard -
> guess we'll see by next year.
>
I agree with this analysis. ZZO and LEV should be wondering how they can do better.
One other note: WAEB-AM has no real in-market news/talk competition. This is the best they can do? Why does WABC from NYC get a significant showing in the Valley?
Logged
Ron
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 21


Re: Spring
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2005, 02:50:40 PM »

> > Ahhhh, CTO, not the same purrrr it used to have. Well,
> > atleast they can still lick themselves and land on their
> > feet.
> >
> > I would love to see the breakdowns 25-54 Mornings.
> >
> > Maybe some one could post the ranks? Please?
> >
>
> Is coming in 2nd 3/10ths of a point below the Hawk really a
> "butt whippin'"? Would think ZZO's the one with the red
> backend, now behind LEV.  In the AM race Oldies 1470 is
> almost tied with WAEB now, would say now successful in
> replacing their popular standards format of a few years
> back.  WHOL is more of a player than I ever remember.  YSP
> is the top non-market station - is it the rock, or Howard -
> guess we'll see by next year.
>
A 1.3 jump in 12+ is a butt wuppin in my book...and Arbitron's too.
Logged
M/Manion
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 341


Re: Spring
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2005, 07:37:27 AM »

> One other note: WAEB-AM has no real in-market news/talk
> competition. This is the best they can do? Why does WABC
> from NYC get a significant showing in the Valley?
>

There are thousands of folks who have moved to The Valley over the last few years who couldn't name a local radio station if their life depended on it. They moved from Jersey and NY and still only listen to NY stations, especially AM station fans. Most don't even know what channel 69 is. They consider where they are living (Macungie, Hanover Twsp, Bethlehem) as a suburb of "The City".
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.06 seconds with 19 queries.