RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 19, 2013, 03:50:37 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: AT LEAST 18 IN A ROW???  (Read 1041 times)
crackthemic3
Guest
AT LEAST 18 IN A ROW???
« on: January 31, 2007, 01:57:01 AM »


Sorry if this is a dumb question but always wondered what the purpose is behind the "At least 18 in a row" moniker. Oviously it sounds great that your playing 18 songs in a row, HOWEVER I have heard a few stations that use this and don't play 18 in a row, they stop down 2 stopsets each hour. Does it have to do something with the clocks? What's 18 an hour and a half commercial free? Or is it simply becuase "18" is a number that has been researched as a common number, or just sounds good?
Logged
Rico Garcia
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 427


Re: AT LEAST 18 IN A ROW???
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2007, 10:57:42 PM »


Sorry if this is a dumb question but always wondered what the purpose is behind the "At least 18 in a row" moniker. Oviously it sounds great that your playing 18 songs in a row, HOWEVER I have heard a few stations that use this and don't play 18 in a row, they stop down 2 stopsets each hour. Does it have to do something with the clocks? What's 18 an hour and a half commercial free? Or is it simply becuase "18" is a number that has been researched as a common number, or just sounds good?

It really depends on the station, but I'll take a shot at a brief explanation/assumption:

Regarding two stopsets an hour - The station may not execute "18 in a row" back-to-back all day. It may be once per day part. Or maybe they do 18 in a row, stopset, 2-3 songs, stopset, then kick off 18 again. Or maybe it's once every couple hours, or every other hour, etc. There are many ways to execute such a concept.

I've also heard stations say "At least 40 in a row" which refers to 40 MINUTES of uninterrupted music. It's all in the wording.

But remember: Just because a marketer (or radio station) says something is amazing doesn't make it so.
Logged

Posts are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer, our employees, advertisers, partners, affiliates. Only two at this price, stock # 85732 and 87231, see dealer for details.
crackthemic3
Guest
Re: AT LEAST 18 IN A ROW???
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2007, 02:03:59 AM »


Gotcha but why 18? A lot of CHR/Rhythmic and even Urbans use "18" you think it would be like 10, or 20, etc.




Logged
JetBlack1015
Guest
Re: AT LEAST 18 IN A ROW???
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2007, 12:07:35 PM »

"AT LEAST 18 IN A ROW" is an old Clifton-ism (referring to Jerry Clifton) it's in place at alot of the stations he consults and it's even still in play with stations he USED to consult.

And more often than not, it's a play on words to refer to the amount of time between stopsets. Like the gentleman before me stated.
Logged
RussAllen
Guest
Re: AT LEAST 18 IN A ROW???
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2007, 02:58:06 PM »

If I remember correctly when I worked at a Clifton station that did the "at least 18 in a row" the reason given was that 18 is just an unusual number not associated with anything (except the radio station the theory was) so it would stand out.

The stations that really executed this well, made everything revolve around 18.  Caller 18 to win contests etc.

Hope that helps some.
Logged
Rico Garcia
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 427


Re: AT LEAST 18 IN A ROW???
« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2007, 03:23:26 PM »

If I remember correctly when I worked at a Clifton station that did the "at least 18 in a row" the reason given was that 18 is just an unusual number not associated with anything (except the radio station the theory was) so it would stand out.

Interesting, but makes sense. Thanks for sharing.
Logged

Posts are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer, our employees, advertisers, partners, affiliates. Only two at this price, stock # 85732 and 87231, see dealer for details.
ShawtyBlack_ATL
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1993


Re: AT LEAST 18 IN A ROW???
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2007, 03:26:33 AM »

Here in ATL WHTA/HOT 107.9(urban) did the "Blazin 18 In A Row" for like almost 2 years.  After that, WWWQ/Q100(chr/pop) did "10 In A Row."  I never remember hearing that many songs in a row.  When it first laucnhed on HOT 107, I believe they actually counted down the songs.
Logged

RussAllen
Guest
Re: AT LEAST 18 IN A ROW???
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2007, 01:00:21 PM »

When it first laucnhed on HOT 107, I believe they actually counted down the songs.

Yes, counting the songs is an important part of drilling into the listeners minds that you really do this.  Back in the day at WPGC we had "Continuous music sweeps" and "Continuous music sweepstakes".  We'd play at least 18 songs in a row in both, the difference was that the continuous music sweepstakes paid off with $100 if you could tell us how many songs we played in a row.

Jocks did breaks like "this is song number 12 of at least 18 songs in a row...".  When we were Jammin' in Jamuary (with lighter spot loads) we'd sometimes have breaks like "this is song number 22 of at least 18 songs in a row".  Seems absurd, but it was to further illustrate that not only did we play at least 18 songs in a row without stopping for commercials (approx 90 minutes) but we'd sometimes go well beyond 18 in a row.
Logged
LeeLHeureux
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 13


Re: AT LEAST 18 IN A ROW???
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2007, 04:03:30 PM »

I've heard several stations still push the 18 as well.  The one that comes to mind first is WZMX in Hartford as it has been their positioning statement for several years..
Logged
ShawtyBlack_ATL
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1993


Re: AT LEAST 18 IN A ROW???
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2007, 01:31:56 AM »

How does the "18 In A Row" compare to "Atleast 50 Minutes of Music" postioners?  I know most Cox Radio stations use that one.
Logged

Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.385 seconds with 19 queries.