Fairness Doctrine

[GRAYWOLF]

Yes, we know you are...

R

Still staring in the mirror, I see...

[GRAYWOLF]

Graywolf, you can read the Constitution all you want,but you will only get out of it,what you are seeking,not understanding it as it was written. Chief Justices Earl Warren,Warren Burger,Benjamin Cordozo(sp),and Justice Felix Frankfurter,conservatives ,liberals, and moderates were they,all were "Constitutionalists".That means they understood what the "founding father meant as well the authors of other admendments . They studied it for years, with AN OBJECTIVE AND OPEN MIND despite their political beliefs. You CANNOT  simple read it and judge andconform it to your politicial viewpoint. If you do, you defeat the integrity of the Constitution itself!! I SUGGEST YOU STUDY IT,NOT JUST READ IT, AND THE STUDYING WILL REQUIRE A FEW MORE YEARS ON YOUR PART TO COMPREHEND IT.

The Constitution says what it means. It is not a "living document" beyond the amendment process, as so many who don't believe in it claim. It is very clear, either the Fed has explicit authority, or it doesn't. There is no implied authority.

Reading someone else's attempt to twist it to fit their agenda is the reason the Constitution has no meaning, anymore. It no longer carries any weight. It should, but the ideological corruption of "interpretation" killed it a long time ago.

[KPLEXCOMPLEX]

"The Constitution says what it means. It is not a "living document" beyond the amendment process, as so many who don't believe in it claim. It is very clear, either the Fed has explicit authority, or it doesn't. There is no implied authority.

Reading someone else's attempt to twist it to fit their agenda is the reason the Constitution has no meaning, anymore. It no longer carries any weight. It should, but the ideological corruption of "interpretation" killed it a long time ago."

Are you really that "bullheaded"not to admit you're wrong  in regards to the Constitution?

The Constitution had been amended well past its original10 amendments,thus making it a"living Document"since it is cited in making decisions regarding Federal Law.

"Reading someone else's attempt to twist it to fit their agenda is the reason the Constitution has no meaning, anymore. It no longer carries any weight. It should, but the ideological corruption of "interpretation" killed it a long time ago."
Again a "copout" that you refuse to acknowledge your error. I cited those who donned the robes who each over as pan of 70 years alone, with different political philosophies and affiliations ,still quoted the Constitution as it was originally intended. YOU are not happy,because it was not solidly along conservative/libertarian lines. Thank God you are not a Justice.BTW The Constitution was an "innovative" idea.Which falls under the Liberal catagory, based on the Magna Carta"another innovative document. As far as"agenda"goes..true the Justices  and this particular Supreme Court have done what you accuse it of. One day they might have a court like Earl Warren's again or that of John Jay who  presided over a fair court. Meantime I strongly suggest you study the topic more deeply as oppose to basing it on your personal feelings like some talk show host would.

[Robert Bass]

Yes, we know you are...

R

Still staring in the mirror, I see...

Just keep telling yourself that, and you will believe it.

R

[Robert Bass]

Reading someone else's attempt to twist it to fit their agenda is the reason the Constitution has no meaning, anymore. It no longer carries any weight. It should, but the ideological corruption of "interpretation" killed it a long time ago.

Oh brother...  I wonder how many Americans will get / did get insulted by that piece of childish tripe.

This oughta stir up an even better fued than the one I was participating in. 

R

[GRAYWOLF]

Are you really that "bullheaded"not to admit you're wrong  in regards to the Constitution?

When I am wrong, I have no problem admitting it. When I am not wrong, no matter what childish insults you try to hurl at me, it will not entice me to state a lie.

Again a "copout" that you refuse to acknowledge your error.

Just because you can not admit the truth, does not mean I made any error, as I have not.

I cited those who donned the robes who each over as pan of 70 years alone, with different political philosophies and affiliations

So what.

still quoted the Constitution as it was originally intended.

Maybe in some instances

YOU are not happy,because it was not solidly along conservative/libertarian lines.

Are you really that clueless?

BTW The Constitution was an "innovative" idea.Which falls under the Liberal catagory

Yes, but it is an antonym to today's bastardized use of the word "liberal" in the US. The founding fathers were "liberal", but in no way shape or form would they resemble today's democrats...or republicans, for that matter.

As far as"agenda"goes..true the Justices  and this particular Supreme Court have done what you accuse it of.

It did not just start a couple of years ago!

Meantime I strongly suggest you study the topic more deeply as oppose to basing it on your personal feelings like some talk show host would.

You really should spend some time actually reading the document instead of accepting whatever twisted interpretation fits your ideology. My statement have nothing to do with my feelings and everything to do with what is written on that parchment. You might want to get a clue before diving in to an discussion you clearly know nothing about.

[GRAYWOLF]

Oh brother...  I wonder how many Americans will get / did get insulted by that piece of childish tripe.

Is that the most mature thing you are capable of saying??? How sad for you. 

[Robert Bass]

Oh brother...  I wonder how many Americans will get / did get insulted by that piece of childish tripe.

Is that the most mature thing you are capable of saying??? How sad for you. 

Oh so now we're playing the maturity game?  Boy that's weaker than your "grow up" comment was.  I don't need your pitiful sympathy.  Direct it towards yourself.

R

[KPLEXCOMPLEX]

Robert: The man is set is in his own world. Must be the same trailer park as D.E.  He refuses to acknowledge fact, and replays tapes of Art Bell 24-7. I am done, he's been done,well done.

[Robert Bass]

Robert: The man is set is in his own world. Must be the same trailer park as D.E.  He refuses to acknowledge fact, and replays tapes of Art Bell 24-7. I am done, he's been done,well done.

Agreed. 

R