RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 21, 2013, 11:07:37 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Suggestions for certain TV stations....  (Read 499 times)
Iowan
rimember

Online Online

Posts: 854


Suggestions for certain TV stations....
« on: July 25, 2007, 10:54:43 PM »

In some markets, some TV stations air both digital and analog versions of the same channel on their HD feed....For example, CBS4-DT in the Quad Cities airs in hi-def on 58.1 (or 4.1 on converters) while the analog signal airs on 58.2 (4.2).  Here's a suggestion for CBS4-DT and other station like this:  You can do what two other stations do and air a weather channel--or better yet--an independent HD subchannel airing syndicated programming not cleared by any other station in the market!  Now that's a good idea there!
Logged
Neil Griffin
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 358


Re: Suggestions for certain TV stations....
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2007, 07:34:36 AM »

The simulcasts of the SD signal are often to provide a better quality piucture for distant cable systems.  Even with the equipment cable companies use, an analog channel 4 signal at 70 miles doesn't look that great (ignition noise, lines from co-channel intereference, etc.).  This provides a signal almost as good as fiber and costs less.
Logged
w9wi
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4292


Re: Suggestions for certain TV stations....
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2007, 08:42:59 AM »

In some markets, some TV stations air both digital and analog versions of the same channel on their HD feed....For example, CBS4-DT in the Quad Cities airs in hi-def on 58.1 (or 4.1 on converters) while the analog signal airs on 58.2 (4.2).  Here's a suggestion for CBS4-DT and other station like this:  You can do what two other stations do and air a weather channel--or better yet--an independent HD subchannel airing syndicated programming not cleared by any other station in the market!  Now that's a good idea there!

As Neil says, this is probably done to provide a better feed for cable systems.  It avoids the aspect ratio problems inherent in having the cable system simply downconvert the 4.1 HD signal.  (for example, finding the branding "bug" spilling off the edge of the 4:3 standard-definition screen) 

Since the first of the year, subchannels have carried various programming obligations - most importantly, EAS and children's E/I programming requirements.  It's expensive to cover that, many stations dumped subchannels rather than buy extra E/I material.  A downconverted copy of one's main program automatically fulfills both requirements.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.279 seconds with 20 queries.