RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 18, 2013, 06:14:18 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WLYT 's Permit to increase ERP  (Read 632 times)
audiomusiclover
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 176


WLYT 's Permit to increase ERP
« on: August 31, 2007, 01:37:16 PM »

Anyone notice that WLYT has a permit in to lower its HAAT from 1535 ft, down to 1220, but almost double its power from 31kw to 58kw?   Guess this change would offer them better local penetration into the buidlings of uptown...
Logged
Mike Sheridan
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2923


Re: WLYT 's Permit to increase ERP
« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2007, 04:35:03 PM »

Interesting thanks for the update.  WLYT has a pretty good signal as is, much better than the 100kw signal on 104.7.  I'd go for the extra height myself.  Seems like they could try an antenna with fewer bays and increase the TPO to better cover the holes.

The thing about RF is it's not always textbook.  Some stations cover better than the data suggests and some worse.

Logged

Worked at 4 of America's great radio stations and bunch you've never heard of.
ghattaway
Guest
Re: WLYT 's Permit to increase ERP
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2007, 08:08:37 PM »

The CP is for an auxiliary antenna- not the main.
Logged
audiomusiclover
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 176


Re: WLYT 's Permit to increase ERP
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2007, 09:55:25 AM »

The CP is for an auxiliary antenna- not the main.

Wow, I didn't see it was for the Aux antenna.  It isn't often when the Aux actually has a stronger ERP than the main, even with reduced HAAT.  That went right over my head...  thx
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.208 seconds with 19 queries.