RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 25, 2013, 03:46:27 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Average Listener age for AM news/talk stations?  (Read 548 times)
dustintv
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 965


Average Listener age for AM news/talk stations?
« on: January 10, 2008, 01:38:04 PM »

 I'd like to know. I'm in my 20s and enjoy listening to AM news/talk stations but I'm a strange kid anyways. Over the holidays I visited my grandparents in Pennsylvania and one day we decided to go to Washington DC. I rode with my grandad, who is 71 in his car. Even though he has XM radio, he kept flipping back between stations WHP and WLBR, both news/talk stations and once we got into Maryland he immediately flipped it to WTOP which we listened to the rest of the way in. I wasn't annoyed at all, just made me wonder how much truth there is to posts on this board which jokes about 90 year old listeners! Cheesy
« Last Edit: January 10, 2008, 01:41:29 PM by dustintv » Logged
jaymarvin
Guest
Re: Average Listener age for AM news/talk stations?
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2008, 01:47:35 PM »

Most stations shoot for adults 25-54. 35-64 is not a bad demo either!
Logged
jimwalsh2001
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 663

Occupation: Radio/TV Broadcaster Hobbies: Guitar/Motorcycles/History


Re: Average Listener age for AM news/talk stations?
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2008, 07:09:52 PM »

Some thoughts on the age issue:

-Bein' old ain't what  it used to be;someone who is sixty now was a teenager when the Beatles came out.

-As the boomers get older, we need to get away from the stereotype of "geezers sitting at home in their underwear."  Think of those commercials with Dennis Hopper talking about retirement...

-The fifty- and sixtysomethings have spending power...

-Too many programmers still think that programming 35+ means doing "geezer"...

-Too many hosts still employ the old-line "talk radio" paradigm that assumes the target listener is sitting at home listening to the radio because they have nothing better to do.  KISS O' DEATH, baby!

-I turned fifty-two today (happy birthday to meeeeee); my wife is just a couple of years behind me.  We still like to get out and boogie.  You hosts and talk programmers out there in cybermessageboardland need to think of your target demo more in terms of "old fogeys" like us.  (An exception is made here to folks like Jay Marvin, Dale Jackson, and the others on this board who I know are doin' it right.  The rest of you know who you are...or do you? Grin)

Logged
smedge2006
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1291


Re: Average Listener age for AM news/talk stations?
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2008, 03:50:28 PM »

Quote
Too many programmers still think that programming 35+ means doing "geezer"...

The baby boomers may be holding on to health and activity longer than their parents, but I'm sure Generation Y finds their rockin' every bit as tedious as boomers found Guy Lombardo on New Year's Eve circa 1970.

Talk radio programmers don't need to focus on keeping 60-year-olds who've been listening to talk for 25 years. They need to catch the people who are just entering the stage in life where they are available for political talk: 30-to-40-year-olds.

Talk radio, it seems, has to go through a re-generation every few years. The middle-agers who discovered talk in the 60's were bluehairs clogging the phone lines in the 80's. Then a new generation of hosts came along with new styles, on both sides of the political spectrum (Neil Rogers, Tom Leykis, Limbaugh and others) that attracted the baby boomers to talk. Talk now needs someone to pull in today's 30-somethings. Limbaugh's not doing it, according to this conservative blogger: "Even conservative kids I meet who like Rush feel about him as you felt about Paul Harvey."


http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/archives/004173.html


Perhaps a mediocre jock from the Howard Stern era could become the Limbaugh of Generation X-Y.
Logged
bigtalkradiofan
Guest
Re: Average Listener age for AM news/talk stations?
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2008, 04:53:27 PM »

Quote
Too many programmers still think that programming 35+ means doing "geezer"...

The baby boomers may be holding on to health and activity longer than their parents, but I'm sure Generation Y finds their rockin' every bit as tedious as boomers found Guy Lombardo on New Year's Eve circa 1970.

Talk radio programmers don't need to focus on keeping 60-year-olds who've been listening to talk for 25 years. They need to catch the people who are just entering the stage in life where they are available for political talk: 30-to-40-year-olds.

Talk radio, it seems, has to go through a re-generation every few years. The middle-agers who discovered talk in the 60's were bluehairs clogging the phone lines in the 80's. Then a new generation of hosts came along with new styles, on both sides of the political spectrum (Neil Rogers, Tom Leykis, Limbaugh and others) that attracted the baby boomers to talk. Talk now needs someone to pull in today's 30-somethings. Limbaugh's not doing it, according to this conservative blogger: "Even conservative kids I meet who like Rush feel about him as you felt about Paul Harvey."


http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/archives/004173.html


Perhaps a mediocre jock from the Howard Stern era could become the Limbaugh of Generation X-Y.


smedge2006,

I completely 100% agree - I couldn't agree more! 

Talk radio does need a new generation of hosts to better connect with the daily lives of Generation X & Y.

I would argue, Sports Talk and Hot Talk currently does a much better job - than political talk - on reaching Generation X & Y, especially guys like Colin Cowherd.  Something more edgy, more entertaining and funny - something that talks about politics, but is also willing to discuss any topic of the day.

Rush is great and all - but I don't think many of Gen X & Y feel that he is "in touch" with what their daily lives are like.  Most Gen X & Y don't spend most of their day at the golf course.

There are lots of Gen X & Y's that listen to political talk - myself included (as my screen name demonstrates). 

But I think if Gen X & Y listeners are given:
    * Two political talker options,
    * Both with the same political bent,
    * Both professional, quality hosts,
    * But one age 60 and one age 35,
    * I think many would opt for their fellow younger, edgier host who likely better "in touch" with what their daily lives are like and can talk with more understanding.

A few weeks back, I heard an older radio host - who isn't good with computers - talk about something related to computers - and it was so bad, I nearly had to turn the channel it was so hard to listen to. 

Whereas, a younger radio host would be more likely to be able to carry on a conversation about: online music/digital piracy, internet streaming, podcasting, instant messaging, social networking sites, etc, etc, etc.

As smedge points out, its' a new world out there - and Gen X & Y's are old enough now to have families and be buying houses, cars, boats, etc, etc, etc - and talk radio needs to be attracting them and putting them in touch with local advertisers.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.333 seconds with 20 queries.