RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 22, 2013, 04:59:32 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Ratings  (Read 807 times)
bw
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 301


Ratings
« on: August 11, 2005, 06:50:57 AM »

Don't post em!
Logged
moohead
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 67


Re: Ratings
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2005, 07:00:55 AM »

Are you concerned non subscribers will use these "posted" numbers? If so, it is my experience they always have and always will. I used to share numbers with 2 non subscribers when I owned the stations.

But, then again, in those days the non subscribers weren't beating or tying Mix and Star in key demos!

Ouch.

Marc



> Don't post em!
>
Logged
bw
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 301


Re: Ratings
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2005, 07:05:23 AM »

Because the numbers are copyrighted data, they may not be reproduced on the site.  That is the reason for the deletion.
(More info included within the Rules of the site...)
Logged
moohead
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 67


Re: Ratings
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2005, 06:07:43 PM »

Jeez...

I shoulda known that.

Dumb Cow


> Because the numbers are copyrighted data, they may not be
> reproduced on the site.  That is the reason for the
> deletion.
> (More info included within the Rules of the site...)
>
Logged
tj1212
Guest
Re: Ratings
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2005, 02:40:44 PM »

On a radio ratings topic, how many more years will it take someone within CC to realize that a network sports radio format in a small market just does not work. You have WENE sitting atop of Pierce Hill Rd with a wonderful 5K non-dir D and 5K dir N signal being wasted on FSR and Yankee games. Major markets, WFAN or KFAN or XTRA with local sports announcers with local interviews, you can pull respectable numbers. I'd be interested in the billables at WENE. I hope they are not paying for the priviledge of operating their fairly new transmitter.
Logged
Kliq
Guest
Re: Ratings
« Reply #5 on: August 16, 2005, 06:40:55 PM »

> On a radio ratings topic, how many more years will it take
> someone within CC to realize that a network sports radio
> format in a small market just does not work. You have WENE
> sitting atop of Pierce Hill Rd with a wonderful 5K non-dir D
> and 5K dir N signal being wasted on FSR and Yankee games.
> Major markets, WFAN or KFAN or XTRA with local sports
> announcers with local interviews, you can pull respectable
> numbers. I'd be interested in the billables at WENE. I hope
> they are not paying for the priviledge of operating their
> fairly new transmitter.
>
Well, nowadays, AM stations barely get sold no matter what the format.  The only reason WNBF makes any money is because the have a salesperson that focuses on it and that is perrenially a top station in the market.  The best thing they can do is go after a niche with as little expense as possible, which is what they are doing now, and hope to use it as an add-on in buys.  It will be tough to fathom either company putting much focuses on AM's when they don't really sell.

I posted this further down the board but I wanted to post it here also to make sure everyone saw it because I would love feedback on it....

When Wild first signed on, the first year-and-half maybe, they were much more rhythmic-leaning and they pulled some pretty big numbers despite having the smallest signal in the market. The ratings went down once management tried to do what they thought was "feminizing" the station for advertising purposes. It's clearly a hot AC during the day, especially in the morning. A rhythmic CHR station would not be playing Creed - Sheryl Crow - Dave Mathews Band - Green Day "Time Of Your Life" consecutively and that is what they are doing. The dip in ratings pretty much corrolates with the change in music philosophy. Now they are trying to fight for the same piece of demographic pie as Star, Mix, and LTB and without a doubt those stations are much better at doing AC and Hot AC. This book told a huge story about Wild if my info is correct, and I am pretty sure that it is. Pretty much 6am-5pm was down during the "Creed-Nickelback-Dave Mathews-Sheryl Crow" part of the day and the numbers went up considerably as it got closer to nighttime when the rhythmic records started playing and it went from a Hot AC to an actual CHR. And no, not a "Rhythmic" CHR. You old timers hear anything resembling a black record and it's "urban". That's why Missy Elliot's "Lose Control" is #9 on the top forty charts and wild barely plays it at night. Their night guy, who is very new to radio and nights by the way, cleaned up at night. You people need to wake up to the 21st century. You people are gonna be left in the dust and radio like it is today is gonna be a thing of the past because people like you guys on this site can't stop living in the past.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.295 seconds with 19 queries.