RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 20, 2013, 12:28:57 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Being a DJ  (Read 622 times)
jeffco
Guest
Being a DJ
« on: August 10, 2005, 08:50:01 PM »

To me this seem slike the least challenging job in radio.

I mean a morning show or a Stern type of a show is not exactly the same as being a DJ in the mid day spot or in overnights.

You don't get to select the music you want to play, you don't get to converse with callers like a talk host, you run contests that were someone elses ideas.

It seems like you talk only when it is okay and for no longer than 10-15 seconds at a clip.

Sensing all this I have no idea why anyone would want to be a standard DJ guy or gal?
Logged
SP1
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 287

Occupation: Master of Porn downloadability Hobbies: Pointing out the obvious


Re: Being a DJ
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2005, 09:03:31 PM »

It seems like you talk only when it is okay and for no
> longer than 10-15 seconds at a clip.
>

Too bad SSshirley and his co-hort dont follow these standards it would make for a better show.

______________
I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day

Logged
radioelizabeth
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 675


Re: Being a DJ
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2005, 09:57:28 PM »

jeffco wrote:
"...Sensing all this I have no idea why anyone would want to be a standard DJ guy or gal?"

Gosh, I hope the goal isn't just to be a standard jock.

You can do a lot to connect with your listener in 10-15 seconds. It just takes more work to tighten the break and not waste the words.

Which I think takes more effort than talking trash to get attention...like some of the others you mentioned.

just my 2 cents though.

Smiley
e

______________
RADIOELIZABETH
Pleasant, Passionate, Persuasive
www.radioelizabeth.com

Logged
FMDawg
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 239


So very true
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2005, 11:08:47 PM »

> You can do a lot to connect with your listener in 10-15
> seconds. It just takes more work to tighten the break and
> not waste the words.
>
> Which I think takes more effort than talking trash to get
> attention...like some of the others you mentioned.

Absolutely. To actually plan ahead and give real thought to what you're going to say, rather than just open the mike and sputter around for a minute or two, requires alot of discipline.  One of my former PD's said "If it can't be said in 15 seconds it probably doesn't need said."

And, you don't just get handed a morning show.  There are alot of skills that have to be honed before that.

Yes, as a mid day person  you'll be a bit more constrained by the format, but having the ability to adapt and do an awesome show within the limits you're given, is what separates the wanna be's from the will be's.
Logged
MrBlutarsky
Guest
Re: Being a DJ
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2005, 09:29:30 AM »

> To me this seem slike the least challenging job in radio.
>
> I mean a morning show or a Stern type of a show is not
> exactly the same as being a DJ in the mid day spot or in
> overnights.
>
> You don't get to select the music you want to play, you
> don't get to converse with callers like a talk host, you run
> contests that were someone elses ideas.
>
> It seems like you talk only when it is okay and for no
> longer than 10-15 seconds at a clip.
>
> Sensing all this I have no idea why anyone would want to be
> a standard DJ guy or gal?
>

where else can you make $50,000 to $100,000 to play music, read the paper,
meet cool rock stars, have a cool "in" with chicks/guys in public, get paid
$100 to $250 an hour to do a "remote", and basically have one of the most cool jobs of anyone you meet?  I've been at parties with lawyers, engineers, and presidents of companies.  They all end up asking about radio.  Nobody wants to know more about how the engineer crunched the numbers to build a bridge or what case set a precedent for the attorney.

I'd say if you get paid to do a job in radio, you've got it made.
Logged
craig_ashwood
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 84

Occupation:Cox Media Group Digital & Strategy Team


Re: So very true
« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2005, 11:39:32 AM »

I had a bit of experience doing middays in Atlanta for awhile and agree: one of the things a non-morning show forces you to learn is word economy.  Using fewer words actually forces the listener to subconsciously "fill in the blanks" using their own thoughts and experiences to flesh out the picture you're painting.  Because of that synergy (and not to sound too mystical and weird about it), the result can often be you receiving more credit than you'd think for being a personality performer on the radio.  It's because the listener is "working with you" to make the break come alive.

Best ever at this is Paul Harvey.  

Best I ever worked with at this was: Jim Morrison, J.J. Jackson, Russ Davis.
Logged
OgOgglby
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 316


Re: Being a DJ
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2005, 11:59:10 AM »

Who makes over $50k to do middays in Atlanta, unless you've been there for 10 years?  If you voicetrack, you might make enough to buy a dining room from IKEA.


> where else can you make $50,000 to $100,000 to play music,
Logged
jjjjr
Guest
Re: So very true
« Reply #7 on: August 11, 2005, 12:14:48 PM »

> I had a bit of experience doing middays in Atlanta for
> awhile and agree: one of the things a non-morning show
> forces you to learn is word economy.  Using fewer words
> actually forces the listener to subconsciously "fill in the
> blanks" using their own thoughts and experiences to flesh
> out the picture you're painting.  Because of that synergy
> (and not to sound too mystical and weird about it), the
> result can often be you receiving more credit than you'd
> think for being a personality performer on the radio.  It's
> because the listener is "working with you" to make the break
> come alive.
>
> Best ever at this is Paul Harvey.  
>
> Best I ever worked with at this was: Jim Morrison, J.J.
> Jackson, Russ Davis.
>

Aren't all those guys DEAD?

I thought YOU were dead.

Thanks for the props, sweetheart.

JJ
Logged
neutral_observer
Guest
Re: So very true
« Reply #8 on: August 15, 2005, 09:36:07 PM »

> > You can do a lot to connect with your listener in 10-15
> > seconds. It just takes more work to tighten the break and
> > not waste the words.
> >
>
> Absolutely. To actually plan ahead and give real thought to
> what you're going to say, rather than just open the mike and
> sputter around for a minute or two, requires alot of
> discipline...
> Yes, as a mid day person  you'll be a bit more constrained
> by the format, but having the ability to adapt and do an
> awesome show within the limits you're given, is what
> separates the wanna be's from the will be's.


...And a funny thing will happen: if you're consistently executing all the basics of the format flawlessly and adding that little extra that truly connects to and adds value to the life and/or listening experience of the listener without adding a whole bunch of time, no one gets terribly concerned if you wind up going 20 or 25...
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.208 seconds with 20 queries.