RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 25, 2013, 12:44:25 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Talkers and Fall listenship data  (Read 1515 times)
Don62
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1021


Re: Talkers and Fall listenship data
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2008, 08:25:38 PM »

Political talk is big with the listeners for the same reason grass soup is popular in North Korea - it's pretty much all they can get. 

The industry doesn't have the courage or the vision to offer anything else. Grin
Dittos.
The same can be said for many other missing radio formats, like real oldies, adult standards, EZ listening, etc.

There's a lot of formats and interesting radio to be had out there, but not under the reins of today's narrow sighted owners.

"We can miss out on school. Won't that be cool. Why go to hear the wisdom of fools."

"And as the elders of our time choose to remain blind, Let us rejoice and let us sing and dance and ring in the new . . .
Hail Atlantis!"
Logged
jimwalsh2001
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 663

Occupation: Radio/TV Broadcaster Hobbies: Guitar/Motorcycles/History


Re: Talkers and Fall listenship data
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2008, 10:09:51 PM »

"And as the elders of our time choose to remain blind, Let us rejoice and let us sing and dance and ring in the new . . .
Hail Atlantis!"

Way dooooooooooooowwwwwwwn, below the ooooooocean... Grin
Logged
KJCB
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4384


Re: Talkers and Fall listenship data
« Reply #12 on: March 26, 2008, 06:37:33 AM »

I agree with basically everything CM said.  For Dennis Miller, when the majority of your clears in markets of significance are (allegedly, since this is a litigious society) brokered time on bad Salem stations, mostly at night, with marginal signals, you can't expect to do well.

Dr. Laura's number does seem a little high.  The world doesn't revolve around Chicago; she is on a dog station in NYC and owns KFI.  Pretty decent on KSFO, as well.  But I think you're right.

Since Sean loves Stephanie Miller so much, I'll add that I was pleased to see Glenn Beck finally overtake Laura Ingrahan and make it as high as he did.  Although does anyone share my sentiments that the show feels different now that it did 5 years ago when, despite huge numbers on my local affiliate at the time, people would say "Glenn who?"?
Logged
Don62
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1021


Re: Talkers and Fall listenship data
« Reply #13 on: March 26, 2008, 09:11:35 AM »

"And as the elders of our time choose to remain blind, Let us rejoice and let us sing and dance and ring in the new . . .
Hail Atlantis!"

Way dooooooooooooowwwwwwwn, below the ooooooocean... Grin

Good catch.

Kind of describes the state of today's radio owners.  Deaf, dumb and blind (their eyes are only open to $$$. Creativity and listeners interests get thrown out the door.)

No one caught on to the first verse?

Logged
Goat Rodeo Cowboy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4159


Re: Talkers and Fall listenship data
« Reply #14 on: March 26, 2008, 10:55:52 AM »

He also has that classic TV Guy presence on radio: LAID BACK.

When you're on the radio, you really have to project more than when you're mic'd for TV.

Really?  Maybe you could pick up a few extra bucks consulting for NPR.  They apparently have not stumbled into this bit of wisdom.

Logged

Community broadcasting blogged at www.yourlpfm.com
Going back to Nashville
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 741


Re: Talkers and Fall listenship data
« Reply #15 on: March 26, 2008, 05:59:08 PM »

I agree with basically everything CM said.  For Dennis Miller, when the majority of your clears in markets of significance are (allegedly, since this is a litigious society) brokered time on bad Salem stations, mostly at night, with marginal signals, you can't expect to do well.

Dr. Laura's number does seem a little high.  The world doesn't revolve around Chicago; she is on a dog station in NYC and owns KFI.  Pretty decent on KSFO, as well.  But I think you're right.

Since Sean loves Stephanie Miller so much, I'll add that I was pleased to see Glenn Beck finally overtake Laura Ingrahan and make it as high as he did.  Although does anyone share my sentiments that the show feels different now that it did 5 years ago when, despite huge numbers on my local affiliate at the time, people would say "Glenn who?"?
KCJB, I'm with you on Glenn Beck, he is not on the radio here anymore because WCKG our FM talk station was blown up to
bring in the FRESH format. I was really starting to like the show, he seemed to be a lot more entertaining than he was when I first
listened to him a couple of years back. I have to agree with you on my last post I "OVERCHICAGOED" it just a wee bit Cheesy   
« Last Edit: March 26, 2008, 06:00:54 PM by TR1992 » Logged
jimwalsh2001
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 663

Occupation: Radio/TV Broadcaster Hobbies: Guitar/Motorcycles/History


Re: Talkers and Fall listenship data
« Reply #16 on: March 26, 2008, 06:21:12 PM »

No one caught on to the first verse?

"We can miss out on school. Won't that be cool. Why go to hear the wisdom of fools."

Steely Dan? Huh
Logged
newhampshiredude
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 276


Re: Talkers and Fall listenship data
« Reply #17 on: March 26, 2008, 09:45:45 PM »

Dennis Miller did seem a little low for me also, but he has been picked up by many more stations since then (I say that as someone who can't stand his show).

I'm a Laura Ingraham fan, but I think Glenn's increased listenership and overtake of her happend because Laura is a niche that just isn't filled by anyone else (Mark Levin is probably the closest) in talk radio, whereas Glenn is more the put-it-in-your-face conservative talker that appeals to the men 25-54 demo, which is very important for talk radio. Laura will still continue to rise in listenership, as will Glenn, but with his inabilty to score big-market affiliations, I think Laura and him will still stay in competition.
Logged
Signal_Faded
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 388


Re: Talkers and Fall listenship data
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2008, 01:38:35 PM »

Okay...I know we all debate this list every time it comes out. The lefties wonder why Schultz is so low and the righties wonder why he is so high.

My question, however, revolves around the numbers of Rush and Sean. Talkers has Rush at 14+ million and Sean at 13+ million. I see ratings in many different markets and notice a significant drop when Hannity takes over for Rush. In some cases I am seeing a 40-50% drop. Most times the drop is 15-30%. So who is not getting the proper credit? Rush at 14+ or Sean at 13+? I've heard some arguments that Rush is pushing 20 million listeners. If he is then I would not be shocked to see Sean near 13-14 million.

Thoughts?
Logged
KJCB
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4384


Re: Talkers and Fall listenship data
« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2008, 03:46:32 PM »

What do you mean "takes over"?  You mean when Rush moves elsewhere and Hannity is left on his own with no lead-in?  Both shows have suffered over the past few years in some markets.  You'll recall KSTP/Minneapolis was more than happy to get rid of both when CC's KTLK-FM came along.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.322 seconds with 20 queries.