RadioDiscussions.com

 
Login June 18, 2013, 01:31:08 AM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: wbz boston: how well is the reception west of the mississippi  (Read 957 times)
blamethemayo
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 172


wbz boston: how well is the reception west of the mississippi
« on: March 26, 2008, 10:33:44 PM »

im just curious as to how often folks west of the mississippi can tune in wbz.

i know they count a few states west of the mighty mississip...as the '38 states' they are heard in..
Logged
kc0ltv
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 262


Re: wbz boston: how well is the reception west of the mississippi
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2008, 11:11:25 PM »

I'm not quite "west of the Mississippi", but farther west than a lot of locations that ARE west of the Mississippi (I'm about 100 mi east of it, not far from the source).  WBZ is fairly weak here, and currently trashed by somebody's IBOC too. 
Logged
mimo
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1120

Ottawa Canada


Re: wbz boston: how well is the reception west of the mississippi
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2008, 11:00:48 AM »

Last time I was in Iowa (around the turn of the century) WBZ was a regular catch with a moderate signal.  I don't think it's that way anymore with WHO's Iboc.
Logged
BRNout
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4558

IBOC buzz-kill


Re: wbz boston: how well is the reception west of the mississippi
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2008, 11:52:23 AM »

Last time I was in Iowa (around the turn of the century) WBZ was a regular catch with a moderate signal.  I don't think it's that way anymore with WHO's Iboc.

No, I was around Cedar Rapids and Dubuque last year and WBZ carried a decent nighttime signal into those areas.  I think that WHO causes more trouble once you get into central Iowa. 

The "38 states" thing is an old radio cliche that probably was true for some east coast stations back in the pre-TV days.  WTIC had a nighttime host back in the 1980s who loved to use that line.  And, it was never true for them thanks to the existence of KRLD.  It would seem that very few stations could actually boast of actually having a listenable signal in 38 states.  The ones that come to mind would be WLW, WGN, WWL, KMOX, WBBM, WJR, and WHAS. 

Many others (WSCR, WLS) get disqualified thanks to Cuban/Mexican interference in the south.  A Cuban blots out 670 in PA more than half of the time; I'm sure it's decimated by the time you get to SC or FL. 

WBZ?  It's pretty tough for any east coast station to pull that off these days.   They'd have to get some signal into each of the plains states (including Texas) and all of the south (inc'l Florida and LA) which is pretty unlikely thanks to IBlOCk, Cuba and Mexico. 
Logged
rbrucecarter5
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3202


Re: wbz boston: how well is the reception west of the mississippi
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2008, 04:17:09 PM »

I used to have pretty good luck with them in West Texas - but a 1030 signed on in Wyoming and that had to be nulled.  Then a lot of Spanish stuff that refuses to shut down at night from over the border - WHO's IBOC finishes it off.  I can't even hear it in Dallas.
Logged
Buckeyes2001
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 929


Re: wbz boston: how well is the reception west of the mississippi
« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2012, 08:07:05 PM »

I have ID'ed WBZ near Des Moines, IA before (Indianola, IA about 15 miles south to be exact) when nulling WHO so they do make it at least that far. Here in Vermilion, OH, my Pioneer HD car radio with actually lock onto their HD signal at night for at least 10 seconds at a time, from over 600 miles away!
Logged
DavidEduardo
Internet Termite
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 24930

"“Win without boasting. Lose without excuse"


Re: wbz boston: how well is the reception west of the mississippi
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2012, 08:14:24 PM »

I used to have pretty good luck with them in West Texas - but a 1030 signed on in Wyoming and that had to be nulled.  Then a lot of Spanish stuff that refuses to shut down at night from over the border - WHO's IBOC finishes it off.  I can't even hear it in Dallas.


Several of the stations on 1030 in Mexico are licensed and notified to the US as fulltime, with talk XEQR in Mexico City running high power at night; that's the station that has historically been heard on 1030 when WBZ is off or where conditions don't favor the Northeast. And XEQR is totally legal under the existing treaties.
Logged

"If you can accept losing, you can't win."
- Vince Lombardi

www.americanradiohistory.com - Broadcasting Magazine and Yearbooks and RCA Broadcast News, Television Magazine, Radio Annual, Radio News, Sponsor, and many, many more.
cyberdad
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3107

Smoother, Fresher, Less Filling...That's Clear!


Re: wbz boston: how well is the reception west of the mississippi
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2012, 08:22:24 PM »

I've heard them as far west as Flagstaff, AZ.  Good signal there, but that was in the 1960s, and probably also a fluke. 

They were, however, absolutely reliable on a nightly basis during my college years in Eastern Iowa. They're still common there.  I also had no problem with them last month in both Omaha and Kansas City (the latter was under a low-powered local). 
Logged

Owner of a radio receiver
icybluelake
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 450


Re: wbz boston: how well is the reception west of the mississippi
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2012, 09:04:59 PM »

WBZ is still a fairly regular catch in eastern Iowa, but maybe not as regular as 20 years ago. WHO isn't much of a factor (interfering with 1030). Of course, eastern Iowa isn't very far west of the Mississippi.
Logged
radioman148
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 11778


Re: wbz boston: how well is the reception west of the mississippi
« Reply #9 on: December 11, 2012, 12:05:53 AM »

I picked up WBZ in Seattle in 1963 before the Casper, Wy station was born. These days WBZ still puts in a very good signal into the Chicago
area, but not the great signal it used to have years ago.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.176 seconds with 19 queries.