RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 21, 2013, 11:00:46 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Columbus: Former and current progressive talk station in ratings tie  (Read 2896 times)
Nate Wesley
Opinionated Contributor
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 2187

make that money


Re: Columbus: Former and current progressive talk station in ratings tie
« Reply #10 on: May 12, 2008, 04:01:24 PM »



....and I didn't say that it was a tiny inconsequential market, now did I?  I said it's a market that few people actually care about. 

Do you dispute that?

Your semantics don't affect your intent.
Logged

I love America more than any other country in the world and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually. 
--James Baldwin
KJCB
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4384


Re: Columbus: Former and current progressive talk station in ratings tie
« Reply #11 on: May 16, 2008, 02:22:52 AM »

I'm an old Cowtown resident, and I'm glad that they have different political perspectives as opposed to all conservatives all the time. However, I think that getting a .5 is at best a moral victory, and moral victories are for losers.  Get that station into the top fifteen, and
then you have done something.  The only really liberal areas I recall are Whitehall and downtown, the inner city.  Is there an upwardly
mobile base in any other part of town? 

Barth, you've been away a long time...Add Upper Arlington, Gahanna, Worthington, Westerville, Clintonville, Campus area, German Village.

I could go on.

As for the loser comment...I'm the one who writes the checks that get advertising on the air.  If you are one of the radio people receiving the checks, then you have no right to look down on those who write them.  Comments like yours make me glad you left Columbus.

Single cities don't matter - radio signals don't stop at city borders. 

Sean: you're killing us.  Your $500 a month may be the cat's pajamas over at 1580 (where I just heard their new liner: "1580 WVKO... right above the "O" in AC Delco), but it's no huge deal.  Tiny nothing AM stations like this have to resort to the format of the month OR one that has a miniscule number of ardent followers like you who will pimp it at every turn.  WTVN doesn't have to rely on message board posters to get people to know it exists.  By the way, I've been trying to call WVKO's vaunted sales department for the past three weeks.  Seems no one's ever over there.  I guess my clients and I, with multi-million dollar annual budgets, will get locked out of all the excitement.  But hey, as long as Bud's Flowers and More in Lancaster gets their buck a clucks ROS spots, that's what matters.  Oh, that's right... you can't hear WVKO in Lancaster.

Logged
jaymarvin
Guest
Re: Columbus: Former and current progressive talk station in ratings tie
« Reply #12 on: May 17, 2008, 05:10:48 PM »

OK, I just have one question! Is that .05 12 plus, 25-54 or 35-64? The reason I ask is my station doesn't look that hot, but 25-54 and 35-64 we do better. We have also moved away from AAR now for the most part except at night.
Logged
Board Editor
Global Moderator
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1629


MOVED: TIO: Columbus: Former and current progressive talk station in ratings ti
« Reply #13 on: May 19, 2008, 10:49:27 AM »

Some posts in this topic have been moved to Take It Outside.

http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index.php?topic=99948.0
Logged
Sean Gilbow
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 658

Occupation: Customer service


Re: Columbus: Former and current progressive talk station in ratings tie
« Reply #14 on: May 20, 2008, 05:07:59 PM »

[EDIT-inflammatory content]



By the way...the PD at AM 1230 was just fired.

http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index.php/topic,100038.0.html
« Last Edit: May 20, 2008, 06:54:13 PM by Managing Board Editor » Logged
Don62
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1021


Re: Columbus: Former and current progressive talk station in ratings tie
« Reply #15 on: May 23, 2008, 08:35:09 PM »

If the station was entirely syndicated, with everything imported, why have a friggin' PD?
Must be a tough job.
Logged
GR
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 50


Re: Columbus: Former and current progressive talk station in ratings tie
« Reply #16 on: July 06, 2008, 10:44:10 PM »

I'm an old Cowtown resident, and I'm glad that they have different political perspectives as opposed to all conservatives all the time. However, I think that getting a .5 is at best a moral victory, and moral victories are for losers.  Get that station into the top fifteen, and
then you have done something.  The only really liberal areas I recall are Whitehall and downtown, the inner city.  Is there an upwardly
mobile base in any other part of town? 

Barth, you've been away a long time...Add Upper Arlington, Gahanna, Worthington, Westerville, Clintonville, Campus area, German Village.

I could go on.

As for the loser comment...I'm the one who writes the checks that get advertising on the air.  If you are one of the radio people receiving the checks, then you have no right to look down on those who write them.  Comments like yours make me glad you left Columbus.

Single cities don't matter - radio signals don't stop at city borders. 

Sean: you're killing us.  Your $500 a month may be the cat's pajamas over at 1580 (where I just heard their new liner: "1580 WVKO... right above the "O" in AC Delco), but it's no huge deal.  Tiny nothing AM stations like this have to resort to the format of the month OR one that has a miniscule number of ardent followers like you who will pimp it at every turn.  WTVN doesn't have to rely on message board posters to get people to know it exists.  By the way, I've been trying to call WVKO's vaunted sales department for the past three weeks.  Seems no one's ever over there.  I guess my clients and I, with multi-million dollar annual budgets, will get locked out of all the excitement.  But hey, as long as Bud's Flowers and More in Lancaster gets their buck a clucks ROS spots, that's what matters.  Oh, that's right... you can't hear WVKO in Lancaster.



KJCB, whoever you are, you are a liar.  You've been "trying to call WVKO's vaunted sales department for the past three weeks.  Seems no one's ever over there."  Oh really?  Maybe you should try leaving a message.  And by the way, you CAN hear WVKO in Lancaster. Try tuning in before sundown, genius.
Logged
Sean Gilbow
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 658

Occupation: Customer service


Re: Columbus: Former and current progressive talk station in ratings tie
« Reply #17 on: July 07, 2008, 04:21:09 AM »

Congratulations, KJCB.  You just got the attention of the General Manager.

By the way, the station gained another tenth of a point in the most recent Arbitrends.
Logged
willcail
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 591


Re: Columbus: Former and current progressive talk station in ratings tie
« Reply #18 on: July 07, 2008, 09:01:25 AM »

WVKO AM is beating Michael Savage and Laura Ingram in Columbus. Plus Three FM stations. It is poised to take over WRFD 880 AM and WTDA FM.
Logged
gr8oldies
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 8688

Whatever Gets You Through The Night


Re: Columbus: Former and current progressive talk station in ratings tie
« Reply #19 on: July 07, 2008, 02:17:02 PM »

There's something that's so exciting about a battle for last place.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.394 seconds with 19 queries.